Urgenthomework logo
UrgentHomeWork
Live chat

Loading..

ENSN201 Enterprise Social Networks

COURSE:         Bachelor of IT / Bachelor of Accounting / Bachelor of Business
Unit Code: 	ENSN201
Unit Title: 	Enterprise Social Networks
Type of Assessment: Group Assignment
Kent Institute Australia

Unit Learning Outcomes addressed:

Upon successful completion of this unit students should be able to:

1. Understand the core principles and concepts of information systems.

2. Describe business processes and how information systems can be used to improve those processes and contribute to business decision making.

3. Understand how information systems work, to a level where new material can be learned without requiring formal training.

4. Work effectively as part of a team in the production of a group report; understand and communicate effectively organizational and management information in a business context.

Assessment Task:

Group Report: Find a global case study which narrates the operations of e-commerce site (e.g. google play store), as detailed below in the Assessment Description.

Group Oral Presentation: Working in a group of 4 students, you will give an oral presentation based on your Group report, as detailed below in the Assessment Description.

ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:

This is a group assignment. Students are required to form a group of 4 (Four) students chosen among them and submit the group names to the lecturer by week 4.

  1. Group Report:

You are required to find a global case study which narrates the operations of e-commerce site (e.g. google play store). Get the approval from your lecturer for your selected case study. Write a report of 2000 words following the below sections with evidences:

  1. Introduction
  2. Organisation Overview
  3. Business Model
  4. Website
    1. Website contents
    2. Hardware Infrastructure
  • Software
  1. Security issues
  2. Payments/Transaction process
  1. Discussion/Recommendations
  2. Conclusion
  3. Individual Contribution (one page summary of each member’s tasks and deliverables) h. Reference
  4. Appendix
  1. Presentation:

Working with the same group members, you will give an oral presentation.

If you are absent from the class at your presentation time, you will get zero for this assessment, unless you have a medical certificate or other extenuating circumstances. Please talk to your tutor before the due date.

There will be 4 speakers, 8-10 slides and an allocated 15 minutes to present.

Use PowerPoint to create the presentation. Save it on a USB so you are ready to present in class.

As this is a group assignment, 50% of the grade will be moderated by peer assessment. Every team member individually must assess their contribution and the contribution of other team members. Please complete Self and Peer Evaluation form (see Appendix A) and submit a print copy to your lecturer on the day of presentation.

Academic Learning Skills staff will give a workshop in class about Oral Presentations, which will be very helpful for this assessment.

ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:

  1. Group Report

This is a group activity and students are required to work with their respective group members. Noindividual submission will be accepted.

You will not receive any marks for this assignment if your group members collectively report against you for non-participation or non-cooperation. You have to nominate someone as your group leader to coordinate the assignment submission.

The report will be submitted online in Moodle by one member of the team ONLY on Friday Week

  1. You have to nominate someone as your group leader to coordinate the assignment submission.
  1. Group Oral Presentation

This assessment is a group activity and students are required to work with their respective groups. Noindividual submission will be accepted.

You will not receive any marks for this assignment if your group members collectively report against you for non-participation or non-cooperation.

GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS

Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.

Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high quality work presented by a student must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System (Moodle). For details please click the link http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606 and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each Trimester.

Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE(5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.

Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.

Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.

GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING

References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism through Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link:

http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606

A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources. Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites (Why can't I

just Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw (thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).


MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC): PRESENTATION

Fail 0-19.9

Pass 20-25

Credit 26-30

Distinction 31-35

High Distinction 36-40

Content

/40

Poor introduction, body and conclusion. Purpose is unclear. Main ideas unclear; structure of the main body incomplete. Conclusion/recommendati ons are missing. The presentation less than 8 or greater than 17 mins.

Basic introduction, body and conclusion. Purpose made somewhat clear and partially achieved. Basic and sound ideas; structure of the main body somewhat complete. Conclusion/ recommendations are missing or irrelevant to the main ideas. Presentation time 13 - 15 mins.

Good introduction, body and conclusion. Purpose made clear and achieved. Good ideas; the structure of the main body is almost complete. Conclusion summarizes presentation; recommendations relevant/derive from the main ideas. Presentation time 13 - 15 mins.

Very good introduction, body and conclusion. Purpose made clear and achieved. Very good ideas; the structure of the main body is complete. Conclusion summarizes presentation; recommendations derive from the main ideas; suggest specific actions. Presentation time 13- 15 mins.

Excellent introduction, body and conclusion. Purpose made very clear and achieved. Excellent ideas; the structure of the main body is complete; the ideas are thoroughly analysed. Presentation time 13 - 15 mins.

Fail 0-9.9

Pass 10- 12.5

Credit 13-14.5

Distinction 15-16.5

High Distinction 17-20

Presentation

/20

Poor use of voice, non- verbal communication and language by all team members. No eye

contact. Full text was read from slides or notes. Nervousness indicated lack of practice.

Basic and sound use of voice, non-verbal communication and language by some of team members. Some eye contact. Some evidence of practice; great part of the text was read from slides or notes.

Good use of voice, non- verbal communication and language. Adequate eye contact. Confident presentation evidences practice; only a small part of the text was read from slides or notes.

Very good use of voice, nonverbal communication and language. Very good eye contact. Confident presentation evidences practice; very limited part of the text was read from slides or notes.

Excellent use of voice, non-verbal communication and language. Excellent eye contact. Obviously wellrehearsed and delivered.

Fail 0-9.9

Pass 10-12.5

Credit 13-14.5

Distinction 15-16.5

High Distinction 17-20

Use of Visual

Aids

/20

No visual aids used or visual aids were poorly designed and did not aid comprehension.

Sound use of visual aids; adequate to aid comprehension.

Good use of visual aids; well designed and aided comprehension.

Very good use of visual aids; well designed and aided comprehension.

Excellent use of visual aids that aided comprehension. Appropriate amount of information on slides

Fail 0-9.9

Pass 10-12.5

Credit 13-14.5

Distinction 15-16.5

High Distinction 17-20

Professionalism /20

All team members were in informal attire and style; did not conform to directions; disorganized; unprepared; unfamiliar with the order of information in slides.

Some of team members were in informal attire and style; somehow prepared and familiar with the order of information in slides.

Not equal participation by all team members .

Most of the team members were in formal attire and style; most of adequately prepared and familiar with the order of information in slides.

Not equal participation by all team members.

All team members were in formal attire and style; most of well prepared. Almost all team members participated equally in presentation.

All team members were in formal attire and style; well prepared. All team members participated equally in presentation.

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.

Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458

Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 5 of 7 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051

MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC): REPORT

Marking

Criteria.

Fail (0-9.5)

Pass (10-12.5)

Credit (13-14.5)

Distinction (15-16.5)

High Distinction (17-20)

Research /20

Little evidence of research. Sources are missing, inappropriate, poorly integrated or lacking credibility. Lacks clear link of sources to arguments.

Basic and sound research. Basic use of sources to support ideas, generally well-integrated, most sources are credible. May be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/application.

Research is generally thorough. h Good use of sources to support ideas, mostly well integrated, sources are credible. May be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/ application.

Thorough research is indicated. Very good use of sources to support ideas, well- integrated, sources are credible. May be minor weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/application.

Thorough research is indicated. Professional use of sources to support ideas, well integrated, sources are credible. Very minor, if any, weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/application.

0-14.5

15- 18.5

19 -22.5

23-26.5

27-30

Content /

Analysis

/30

Lacks coherence; topic is poorly addressed; little analysis. No evidence from external research to support the case material. The discussion is descriptive and poorly sequenced.

Is generally coherent; topic is addressed to a reasonable depth with some description.

External research on concepts relevant to the case material is somehow obvious; the concepts are analysed to a reasonable depth. There are some inconsistencies/ weaknesses with the flow.

Is coherent and flows well; topic is addressed quite well. External research on concepts relevant to the case material is obvious; the concepts are analysed quite well. There may be some inconsistencies/ weaknesses with flow.

Is very coherent and flows well; topic is addressed quite well. External research on concepts relevant to the case material is obvious; the concepts are analysed in depth. There may be minor inconsistencies and weakness with flow.

Professional work. Argument is very coherent and flows well; topic is addressed thoroughly. External research on concepts relevant to the case material is of an outstanding quality; the concepts are analysed in great depth. Very minor, if any, inconsistencies and weaknesses with flow.

Fail (0-9.5)

Pass (10-12.5)

Credit (13-14.5)

Distinction (15-16.5)

High Distinction (17-20)

Structure

/20

The report is not appropriately formatted; more than two of the required sections are missing.

The report format is generally correct; the information under the sections does not completely correspond to the requirements.

Recommendations are missing.

The report format is almost correct; l the information under the sections correspond to almost all the requirements.

Recommendations are missing or do not suggest specific actions.

The report format is correct; all sections are included; the information under the sections corresponds to the requirements Recommendations do not suggest specific actions and do not derive from the discussion.

The report format is correct; all sections are included; the information under the sections corresponds to the requirements Recommendations do suggest specific actions and derive from the discussion

Fail (0 – 7)

Pass (7.5 -.9)

Credit (9.5 -11)

Distinction (11.5 – 13)

High Distinction (13.5-15)

Language/

Presentation

/15

Poor standard of writing. Word limit may not be adhered to.

Basic and sound standard of writing; some errors in

punctuation, grammar and

spelling

Good standard of writing; few errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling.

Very good standard of writing; very few or minor errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling.

Professional standard of writing; no errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling.

Referencing

/15

No referencing is evident or, if done, is inconsistent and technically incorrect. No or minimal reference list, mixed styles.

Basic and sound attempt to reference sources; may be some inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Reference list is generally complete with 1 or 2 references missing.

Good attempt to reference sources; inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Few inaccuracies in reference list and all references listed.

Very good attempt to reference sources; very minor inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed.

Professional level of referencing and acknowledgment; no errors of style evident. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed.

Appendix A

Enterprise Social Networks

Group Oral Presentation

Self and Peer Evaluation Form

Group No. ________ Assessment No. 2 Date ________

Name of

Group Member

[include yourself]

No. of meetings attended [e.g. 2/3]

Role (contribute ideas, leadership, type report, prepare presentation, etc.)

Overall Contribution Major/ Minor/ None

Points

[0 to 100]

1.

2.

3.

4.

Assignment Help Australia

Australia University Assignments

Copyright © 2009-2023 UrgentHomework.com, All right reserved.