Part 2 forms the report body of your whole report. It has 2 section.
Section 1: your hard disk for the others’ to investigate (5 marks)
Please write a summary report on how you conduct the required hands-on tasks to create the hard disk for your groupmate. Your report should be reasonably self-contained. Without referring to this assignment sheet, by reading your report alone, one should have a good understanding on what you have performed. In your report, please make sure that you have the following:
Note: please do not provide this level of details to your groupmate, who is supposedly to investigate this hard disk of yours to independently find out the information.
Section 2 – your investigation and your findings (10 marks)
Please write a summary report on how you conduct the investigation hands-on tasks on the hard disk you have received from your groupmate. Your report should be reasonably self-contained. Without referring to this assignment sheet, by reading your report alone, one should have a good understanding on what you have performed. In your report, please make sure that you also have the following:
The marking rubrics for the report
Please note that a report is marked in its entirety based on the marking rubrics also in their entirety. A report cannot be marked by its individual keywords in isolation; nor can any individual marking rubric be applied in isolation by itself alone. For example, the irrelevant content in the report cannot be treated as if it does not exist. To the contrary, any irrelevant content weakens the logic flow and reduces the relevance of the report. |
|||||
85%-100% |
75%-84% |
65%-74% |
50%-64% |
<50% |
0% |
comprehensive understanding of the topics covered thoroughly coherent relevant and accurate with in-depth analysis convincible, sound, and smooth logic excellent writing, concise, clear, and complete all claims backed up by evidence or argument no irrelevant nor inaccurate statements |
good understanding of the topics covered well coherent relevant and accurate sound logic clear writing, concise, and complete majority claims backed up by evidence or argument no irrelevant nor inaccurate statements |
reasonable understanding of the topics covered coherent largely relevant and accurate good logic generally clear writing, reasonably concise, and mostly complete most claims backed up by evidence or argument occasionally irrelevant and inaccurate statements with little impact on the report in a whole |
basic understanding of the topics covered reasonably coherent relevant and accurate in general basic logic understandable writing, somewhat clear, and largely complete claims largely backed up by evidence or argument a few irrelevant and inaccurate statements with noticeable impact on the report in a whole |
little or no understanding of the topic, with irrelevant content, unstructured and unclear writing |
just a few keywords without meaningful sentences |
Follow Us