ASSESSMENT ONE

INSTRUCTIONS:

ALL Assessment are to be completed as individual work.

Upload one PDF file for the Assessment drop box located in the Assessments area of this course. Please note page guidance and directions carefully.

Task 1:

the risks that might limit the deployment of the technology.
the scope/applications of the technology.

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS FOR ASSESSMENT

Avoid plagiarism issues by uploading your draft several times before submission in the relevant Draft box. Drafts are not stored in the main repository of Turnitin and will therefore not compare against the final submission.
Attach the completed and signed Plagiarism Declaration at the beginning of your document. Assessments without a completed coversheet and signed Plagiarism Declaration form will not be accepted.

FORMATTING INSTRUCTIONS

3. Insert a Table of Contents – to be automatically generated.
Use either MS-Word or Endnote referencing software for inserting citations and references. However, do NOT use both together.
3. No more than 10% of quotes
4. Add page numbers

Marking Rubric Guide

A top-quality report will have the characteristics of an exemplar business report

Course: Assessment: Student Name


		Accomplished (65% - 79.9%)	Capable (50% - 64.9%)
				Evaluation of a few or no capabilities, benefits, risks and scope of current and emerging disruptive technologies.
Task 1	Clear and consistent integration of a wide range of literature as a foundation for well-reasoned argumentation.	Comprehensive analysis and synthesis of details, facts, concepts, etc.	Some integration of the literature as a foundation for well-reasoned argumentation.	Little analysis and synthesis of details, facts, concepts, etc.
			13-10.5	10-0
					/20
	Highly comprehensive analysis and synthesis of details, facts, and concepts.	Competent application of knowledge to the assessment topic. Clear and consistent integration of the literature as a foundation for well- reasoned argumentation		Little analysis and synthesis of details, facts and concepts. Little integration of the literature as a foundation for well-reasoned argumentation.

	Comments:				/20