3013.1.3 : Evaluating Feasibility and
Profitability
The graduate evaluates the feasibility and profitability of new products
and services within the organization.
3013.1.4 : Marketing Strategy
The graduate designs a strategic marketing plan for a new product or
service.
Select a business from one of the industries listed below:
• agriculture
• banking
• hospitality
• healthcare
WGU Performance Assessment
https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/001283956/course/19820010/task/2292/ove...
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined
total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one
individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from
sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is
provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission
because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your
work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric
aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant
portions of the course.
c. Discuss two inherent risks associated with
launching the new products and/or services to a global market and how to
minimize these risks.
2. Discuss the customer relationship management (CRM) software system
you prescribe to track product and/or service inquiries and sales.
4. Discuss a major pricing strategy (i.e., cost plus pricing,
competition-based pricing, break-even-based pricing, penetration-based
pricing, premium pricing) aligned to your products and/or
services’position within the overall market strategy of the global
marketplace.
a. Identify costs associated with developing and launching the new
products and/or services. b. Evaluate consumer acceptance of the price
set for the new products and/or services.
i. Justify why you chose these channels based on market segmentation
(e.g., demographics, psychographics, behavioral characteristics)
b. Discuss two sales promotion activities (e.g.,
coupons, games, contests, sweepstakes) you would use to promote your new
products and/or services in a global market.
B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for
content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
A1:NEW PRODUCTS AND/OR SERVICES
|
|
The 2 new products and/or ser-
|
vices are not identified.
|
|
|
|
|
A1A:METHODS
|
COMPETENCE
|
The provided discussion in-
|
|
The provided discussion in- |
|
|
cludes 3 different methods. |
|
fundamentally unacceptable.
|
The discussion is poorly rea- |
sufficiently supported.
|
|
|
cludes 1 competitive advantage
|
|
|
|
pany will gain the competitive |
|
A1C:INHERENT RISKS
|
|
The provided discussion in-
|
cludes fewer than 2 inherent
|
The provided discussion in- |
|
|
|
|
launch. The discussion does not
|
ated with the launch and how
|
minimize the identified risks. |
|
|
|
|
The discussion is poorly rea- |
and sufficiently supported.
|
A2A:CRM INFORMATION
An explanation of how the in- |
|
|
formation generated by the
|
The provided explanation is in-
|
complete (provides detail on |
|
|
|
|
the information generated by
|
by the CRM software will be |
tices and track sales in a global |
the CRM system will be used),
|
used), clear, and appropriate. |
|
|
WGU Performance Assessment
https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/001283956/course/19820010/task/2292/ove...
A3:DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL
|
|
The provided analysis of how |
|
|
the global supply chain may af-
|
product or service is not pro-
|
|
fect the product or service is |
vided or the analysis is funda- |
|
sufficient. The analysis is well |
|
|
reasoned and sufficiently sup-
|
poorly reasoned or lacks suffi-
|
|
A discussion of a major pricing |
|
The provided discussion of a |
strategy is not provided or the |
The provided discussion of a |
|
|
|
cient. The discussion is well rea-
|
acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
A4A:COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT AND LAUNCH
An evaluation of consumer ac- |
COMPETENCE
|
The provided evaluation of con-
|
|
The provided evaluation of |
|
|
|
The evaluation is well reasoned
|
acceptable.
|
|
|
A5:PROMOTIONAL STRATEGY
|
|
The provided discussion of the
|
strategy is not provided or the |
The provided discussion of the
|
promotional strategy is suffi- |
|
|
|
|
cient. The discussion is poorly
|
soned and sufficiently sup-
|
|
|
The discussion does not iden- |
|
The discussion appropriately |
tify 2 mass media and 2 social |
|
identifies 2 mass media and 2 |
|
propriately identifies 2 mass |
|
A5AI:JUSTIFICATION OF MEDIA CHANNELS
|
|
The provided justification of |
channels were chosen is not
|
The provided justification of |
why the media channels were
|
provided or the justification is |
|
|
|
|
cation is well reasoned and suf-
|
fication is poorly reasoned or
|
|
A discussion of 2 sales promo- |
COMPETENCE
|
The provided discussion of 2 |
|
The provided discussion of 2 |
|
|
|
ficient. The discussion is well |
unacceptable.
|
sufficient. The discussion is |
reasoned and sufficiently sup-
|
|
|
Content is unstructured, is dis- |
COMPETENCE
|
Content reflects attention to |
jointed, or contains pervasive |
Content is poorly organized, is
|
|
errors in mechanics, usage, or |
|
|
|
errors in mechanics, usage, or
|
in the task or chosen by the can-
|
|
|
|
|
Terminology is misused or inef-
|
is used correctly, and effectively
|
|
|
WGU Performance Assessment |
|