And justification for the wireless access network wan

			technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the Wireless Access Network (WAN).	technical requirements and proposal for the Wireless Access Network (WAN), but lacked an appropriate justification.	requirement, but the proposal and justification for the
	Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the computer systems and hardware.			Provided a description of the technical requirements and proposal for the computer systems and hardware, but lacked an appropriate justification.		The technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the computer systems and hardware of the paper were off topic or failed to provide required level of detail.
	Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. Reference list entries and in-text citations are correctly formatted using the appropriate IEEE style for each type of resource. The description appropriately used information from 5 or more authoritative sources, i.e. journal articles, industry or trade publications,	Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. One or two minor errors in IEEE format for intext citations and/or reference list entries. The description appropriately used information from 4 or more authoritative sources, i.e. journal articles, industry or trade publications, news articles, industry or government white		Work contains a reference list containing entries for cited resources. Work contains no more than 5 minor errors in IEEE format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries. The description appropriately used information from 2 or more authoritative sources, i.e. journal articles, industry or trade publications, news articles, industry or		Reference list is missing. Work demonstrates an overall failure to incorporate and/or credit authoritative sources for information used in the paper.
	news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites.
Satisfy standards of writing style and grammatical correctness				Submitted work has numerous errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Work is unprofessional in appearance.
Overall Score	Excellent	Good	Proficient)	Needs Improvement	Needs Significant Improvement	Missing or Unacceptable

Network Design Proposal Part 2

implementation to support the technical requirements	description of the technical requirements, proposal, and	justification for the DMZ	implementation.	technical requirements and	requirement for the DMZ
Assessed the appropriate physical security necessary to support the technical requirements	Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the physical security.				Identified a technical requirement for the physical security, but the proposal and justification lacked detail and/or was not well supported.	The technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the physical security of the paper were off topic or failed to provide required level of detail.
				Provided a description of the technical requirements and proposal for the additional security measures. Provided a justification that was lacking in detail and/or was not well supported.
Sources / Resources				Work contains a reference list containing entries for cited resources. Work contains no more than 5 minor	Work attempts to credit sources but demonstrates a fundamental failure to understand and apply the IEEE	Reference list is missing. Work demonstrates an overall failure to incorporate and/or credit authoritative
					formatting standard. The description appropriately used information from 1 or more authoritative sources, i.e. journal articles, industry or trade publications, news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites.
		Work contains minor errors in formatting, grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance.	Errors in			No work submitted for this assignment.
Overall Score	Excellent	Good	Acceptable	Needs Improvement	Needs Significant Improvement	Missing or Unaceptable

				detail and/or was not well supported.
Assessed the proper log storage and management				Provided a description of the technical requirements and proposal for the log storage and management. Provided a justification that was lacking in detail and/or was not well supported.
	Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the troubleshooting methodology.	Provided an outstanding description of the technical requirements, proposal, and			Identified a technical requirement and proposal for the troubleshooting methodology, but the justification lacked detail and/or was not well supported.	The technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the troubleshooting methodology of the paper were off topic or failed to provide required level of detail.
	Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. Reference list entries and in-text citations are correctly formatted using the appropriate IEEE style for each type of resource. Five or	Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. One or two minor errors in IEEE format for intext citations and/or reference list entries. Four or more authoritative sources were used.		Work has no more than three paragraphs with omissions of citations crediting sources for facts and information. Work contains a reference list containing entries for cited resources. Work contains no more than 5 minor
	more authoritative sources were used.			errors in IEEE format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries.
Satisfy standards of writing style and grammatical correctness				Submitted work has numerous errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Work is unprofessional in appearance.
Overall Score	Excellent	Good	Proficient)	Needs Improvement	Needs Significant Improvement	Missing or Unaceptable