Drafting disciplinary action
Drafting disciplinary action
. . At a time when most secondary black schools only provided vocational or “ general” curricula.
. There is no question that his parents played a crucial role in grooming Houston to become the man that he was later in life. Chances are that if Houston was born into a family of uneducated laborers who either did not believe in or care about upward class mobility, Houston intellectual nature would have been repressed and he would have ended up at one of those trade schools, if at any school at all. Without his distinguished academic background, Houston would have never ended up at the university of Amherst. His experiences there were more significant than just receiving a higher education, Amherst is where Houston really began to experience the disparity between blacks and whites during that time period. “ As the only black student in 1 91 5” he took the trials he suffered which included isolation and racist behavior and used them to motivate himself toward academic excellence (Linden Around the time Houston finished up at Amherst, America had entered World War I as a fighting member of the alliance.
In 2010, the controversial military practice “ don’t ask don’t tell” officially began to be dismantled after President Obama signed the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010. This was seen as a landmark victory or the members and supporters Of the GLUT community, who viewed DADA as the systematic discrimination of a minority group by a branch of the government. Of course, whenever a decision is made in government when dealing with a sensitive subject, there is always backlash from opposition groups. In this case, high ranking officials from the army and marines visited congress and petitioned them to reconsider their decision to repeal the anti DADA bill.
Their primary reasons being: “ social upheaval among the tight units that live and fight side by side for moths at a time” and “ potential for corruption”. Even while subscribing to these ideas, they conceded that openly gay people serving in the military were bound to happen at some time (Flattery. ) This clearly shows that because the repeal of DADA didn’t necessarily apply to them, the generals didn’t want to take a low risk Of allowing homosexuals to be who they really were in the line of duty. Moreover, their conservative temperament had rendered them incapable of evaluating the potential positives that could arise from eliminating DADA.