Criminal ethics: determining right from wrong assignment

N assumes that “ morality is part of the natural order of the universe” (Poll Therefore, it doesn’t matter what part of the world one comes from, cert. as theft is naturally bred within each of us to be recognized as wrong or We know it’s wrong because theft would violate a person’s trust in another Ewing, giving us a natural warning to avoid that person. This system is a comparable to the religion system. In the religion system there is a belie know right and wrong, but unlike the natural law system, religion gives c to immorality through God’s wrath.

By stealing, the classmate is going a rules, and therefore the manager would have to report him or her. In the God is the Judge of morality, and if one is following his guidelines on who wrong, it’s easy to determine a response to an ethical dilemma. Even the religions around the world are different, they are all still based on the c God or Gods that teach a list of rules that its followers must rely upon. Morals, the ethics of virtue system, the natural law system, and the religion system, while slightly did nature, would all feel ethically responsible for reporting the classmate t of the store.

Most cultures AR we as humans don’t usually tend to think of the moor such concrete ways of labeling them as “ ethical idle tit dilemmas we immediately begin to analyze our understand certain concepts like for example, the FAA supervised by adults and that it isn’t right to drink al of passing out of consciousness. However, without judgments are correct, it’s hard to comprehend why Becoming an ethical professional requires one to UN into place. Once we understand why it’s important why it’s not okay to drink alcohol until one is incapacity moral rules we can live by and use as a guide (Polo that our laws are made to keep everyone as safe as the harm that can come to a young child who is left without adult supervision, he or he is able to live by and believe in an ethical system in which to refer to when one finds himself in an ethical dilemma.

Therefore, once we understand why certain laws are put into place, we are less likely to follow them “ Just because we don’t want to get into trouble” and more because it’s Just the right thing to do. Unfortunately, human error will always exist, which is why we have systems like law enforcement in place. Since our Justice system is made up laws created to keep us safe, it’s important for all members to understand our moral codes and why they exist. Becoming an ethical professional is incredibly important, especially if one chooses to work in the public sector. I have been working hard to complete my degree in Management Studies. In order to do this, I took a different business course in ethics that focused on the differences between working in the public sectors versus private sectors.

The man was clearly drunk, and he deserved to be arrested because if not, he could have crashed his car, potentially hurting another human being. Now, let’s suppose that the next day the same officer pulls over another man he determines could possibly be driving under the influence of alcohol. When the officer pulls the man over, he realizes it’s the son of his boss, the police chief. Because police officers have the power of using police discretion, this particular officer calls his boss to explain the situation before putting his son under arrest. His boss asks him to bring his son to the police station, but not to arrest him. What should the officer do? If he doesn’t arrest the chiefs son, he is a hypocrite, and he is promoting unsafe behavior that could impact public safety.

If he does arrest the chiefs son, he is putting his own Job in Jeopardy by potentially harming the police chiefs reputation, therefore possibly creating an uncomfortable work environment. The easiest option for the officer would be to make sure no one heard of what happened and hope that the police chief gets his son help so that he does not drive drunk again. However, ethically, it would be wrong to let the chiefs son go free without any consequence to his crime that could’ve potentially killed another person. Using the steps above, the officer should first identify the facts of the situation. Just like the arrest he made the previous day, the officer found himself in front of a man who could potentially hurt another human being due to the immoral choice of driving while drunk.

Unfortunately the message shown was that those with special privileges such as being lucky enough t e born as the police chiefs son, allows one to escape the consequences of certain actions. At this point in the scenario, corrective Justice comes into play. In order to recreate harmony in the community, the police officer, the police chief and the chief son would have to somehow show retribution for their crimes. In the case of the officer and police chief, retribution might be shown by stepping down from their positions. While the officer may have thought he was doing something helpful for the police chief and his son, he was also relinquishing the trust in which the community had in him.

The police chiefs son might show retribution by giving up o his innocence and instead allowing himself to be legally charged with the crime of driving under the influence of alcohol. By actually feeling the consequences to their actions, it is then our hope that each individual involved in the case will morally gar as ethical persons. After analyzing this particular scenario, it’s important to note that Just because something is a law, doesn’t mean it’s necessarily a moral compass to follow. Because laws are created by human beings, there always needs to be the awareness that it could still be arbitrary or unfair. This is why we in the United States of America have such a complex Justice system.