Nato and terrorism essay

The attack was carried out by recruited people of al-Qaeda terrorist network, to pursuit the explicit aim of al-Qaeda’s leader, Osama bin Laden, and to terrorize American nation. [4]About TerrorismTerrorism is neither a movement nor apolitical philosophy, and it is not a synonym for political aggression in general. It is a special method or means of conflict which has been used by a broad variety of regimes and factions. It is systematic and premeditated, which aims to create an environment of extreme terror or fear. The modern word of terrorism and terror are derived from “ terrere” and “ deterre” Latin words, that means to cause to tremble and to frighten from respectively. The waord Terrorism and Terrorist practically did not use until the 1790s the period of the French Revolution. [5]A key characteristic of terrorism is that it is aimed at a wider target or audience than the immediate victims. It is one of the first types of psychological warfare.

The Sun Tzu an ancient Chinese strategist conveyed the core idea of the process when he wrote a book “ kill one, frighten ten thousand”. Terrorism involves in attacks on symbolic and random targets which includes civilians to create an environment of extreme fear in the world. [6]Whenever, any country or a nation is at a critical stage and it feels that someone might capture his homeland, and then he bears the courage to fight for his homeland as for the love of his country. There are special rules and principles according to which countrymen can protect their nation from enemies. An alliance was formed by the European countries and the US when they were facing attacks from the Soviet Nations.

It has a presence in at least fifty countries. Its activists are drawn from a wide range of Muslim countries, and some originate from the Muslim diaspora within Western societies”. [10]Base of TerrorismThe United States provided weapons to most of the arrived mujahidin in Bosnia to fight against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan during the 1980s. A large section of the Bosnian mujahidin was also closely associated with the most outstanding Afghan-Arab and Saudi Arabian born Osama Bin Laden, and his organization named Al-Qaeda. But after the Soviet forces were defeated by the mujahidin, and the withdrawal of the USSR, these forces felt neglected by the United States and annoyed when the United States military forces were entered into Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War I against Iraq in 1991. [11]Terrorist Attacks – September 11, 2001After the targeted attacks of Sep.

11, 2001, new phase opened in international relations, and the alliance faced new challenges with responsibilities to take united decision being multilateral organization. In fact, soon after the attacks in New York and Washington by the terrorist, NATO in which many authorized people had dismissed before their times by declaring it terminally ill alliance, promptly started to reorient its function in international security. [12]Only after the incidence of September 11, 2001 that NATO Washington became fully awakened to the crisis generated by the support or benign political neglect of radical and extremist Muslim fighters within and outside the Balkans. Therefore, NATO adopted various actions to flush out terrorist cells all over Southeastern Europe by the end of 2001.

actions may serve to alienate political support in Europe (and elsewhere). The United States is likely to continue to engage in a vast program of coalition-building, performed largely outside formal institutional arrangements. NATO will not fall apart or collapse as a result of September 11, but it may receive less attention, resources, and diplomatic energy, at precisely the time it needs more of all three”. [14]Today, the plan, which is residing among the partner countries, comprises of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council and NATO-Russia Council. These two comprise of the supporting countries that have been with NATO since its formation and have supported this alliance against terrorism in every positive means. Apart from its member countries, NATO is also sharing up its part with other international organizations and is taking and giving information to those organizations so that their law enforcement agencies could be proven helpful for NATO in finding fearful and wanted people.

In accordance with all of the above statements it has been proved that NATO is trying its level best to curb the germ named terrorism but is continuously failing in it because the rising umber of crimes and criminals. However, a team like NATO should be within every country so that it could have a worldwide terror-curbing network. It has been proved that what were the aims and objectives on which NATO was created. However, it is reminded again that when the US and UK colonies and European nations faced severe attacks from the sides of the Soviet Unions and Soviet nations, then they decided to create an allied force named NATO. NATO is supposed to be helpful in curbing the roots of terrorism and it is doing it as its prime duty but the greatest terrorist shock that rocked the whole world as well as NATO was the 9/11 attacks. “ The September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States have made a smooth joint planning and coordination process even more urgent. While NATO invoked for the first time in its history its collective defense clause, it seems likely that the United States will coordinate its planned attacks on terrorist targets outside the European theater with individual allies rather than through the North Atlantic Council. As a result of the attacks, Washington will be reluctant to add more resources to Balkan peace management, at least in the short term”.

Routledge. New York, Year: 2003Paul B. Rich and Thomas R. Mockaitis. Grand Strategy in the War against Terrorism. Frank Cass.

London. Year: 2003[1] Lenard J. Cohen, Alexander Moens, and Allen G. Sens.

Cohen, Alexander Moens, and Allen G. Sens. Praeger. NATO and European Security: Alliance Politics from the End of the Cold War to the Age of Terrorism. Westport, CT. Year: 2003. Pg.

79[8] Lenard J. Cohen, Alexander Moens, and Allen G. Sens. Praeger. NATO and European Security: Alliance Politics from the End of the Cold War to the Age of Terrorism. Westport, CT. Year: 2003.

xxiii[12] Lenard J. Cohen, Alexander Moens, and Allen G. Sens.

Praeger. NATO and European Security: Alliance Politics from the End of the Cold War to the Age of Terrorism. Westport, CT. Year: 2003. Pg.

Westport, CT. Year: 2003. Pg. 74