Knowledge and skill level demonstrated class discussion


Submission Date: 06/03/2021	Submission Time: Choose an item.


	Apply propositional logic, sets, functions and relations as modelling tools and for reasoning about statements.
2
	Implement stream and block cipher algorithms, shared and public key methods, message authentication codes and digital signatures in cyber security contexts.

Guidance notes and considerations

Late Submission
If you are not able to complete your coursework on time due to extenuating circumstances, the ONLY way to receive an extension (up to 5 working days) or a deferral (anything longer than 5 working days) is to contact a Registry team member located at your specific CU site.

Plagiarism and Malpractice
* You are encouraged to check the originality of your work by using the draft Turnitin links on your Moodle Web.

Where earlier work by you is citable, ie. it has already been published/submitted, you must reference it clearly. Identical pieces of work submitted concurrently will also be considered to be self-plagiarism.

Submission Guidelines
There should be a title page which clearly identifies the following;
* Name of the module
* Title of the Assessment * Assessment number
* Word count
The word count identified includes quotations, but excludes the bibliography and unless specifically stated, encompasses a discrepancy of + or – 10%.

		Analysis, Evaluation and Application of Theory (30%)
		Demonstrates an exceptional grasp of relevant analytical techniques, and the ability to apply these to new and/or abstract information and situations. Shows a highly developed appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate uses of particular analytical and evaluative approaches. Knowledge and understanding of theory, where relevant, is highly detailed. Exceptional appreciation of the limits of theory demonstrated throughout all assessment outcomes. Approach to assessment task is theoretically informed to an exceptional standard.
	Outstanding knowledge base exploring, analysing and evaluating the discipline and its theory with clear originality and autonomy.	Demonstrates an outstanding grasp of relevant analytical and/or evaluative techniques. Shows a developed appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate uses of particular analytical and/or evaluative approaches. Knowledge and understanding of theory, where

	Good knowledge base that supports some analysis and/or evaluation and problem-solving in theory and/or practice within the discipline.	Makes good use of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation, relevant to the discipline. Sound descriptive knowledge of key theories with some appropriate application.
	Satisfactory knowledge base demonstrating comprehension and formulation of basic knowledge with some omissions at the level of theoretical understanding. Limited ability to discuss theory and solve problems within the discipline.
35-39% (Marginal Fail)	Outcomes not or only partially met. Restricted knowledge base demonstrated. Limited understanding of discipline. Difficulty with linking theory and problem solving within the discipline.			Referencing in the CU version of Harvard is inconsistent.