Questionnaire design see marking rubric row
* Note: Students will already be officially registered into small assignment groups, which remain the same for this assignment
[Note that you are NOT required or permitted to actually go out and collect primary data].
This assessment builds upon your Literature Review (assessment 2) in that you should now be aware of what additional data is needed to lead you to the answer to your research question (RQ). Rather than search for additional secondary data, this methodology report requires you to specify what primary data you would plan to collect and analyse. [Note that you are NOT required or permitted to actually go out and collect primary data].
Introduction, including your research question (RQ).
A detailed research methodology addressing the Research Design (see Marking Rubric row 2) proposed research sample (see Marking Rubric row 3), questionnaire design (see Marking Rubric row 4), envisaged data collection method, and envisaged analysis method (see Marking Rubric row 5), and a conclusion (see Marking Rubric row 6)
HI6008 Assignment 3 – Research Design and Methodology - Marking Rubric
Excellent |
[3 Marks] |
Questionable |
||||
(max 5) |
Report creates an excellent overall impression | Report creates a very good overall impression | Report creates a good overall impression | Report creates a questionable overall impression | Unprofessional or confusing | |
Research Design |
Ample evidence of advanced understanding regarding research design | Evidence of very good understanding regarding research design | Evidence of good understanding regarding research design | Questionable understanding regarding research design | Missing or confusing | |
| Research Sample (max 5) | Sampling approach, sample frame, sample size excellently explained and justified | Sampling approach, sample frame, sample size well-explained and justified | Sampling approach, sample frame, sample size explained and justified | Sampling approach, sample frame, sample size questionably explained or justified | Missing or confusing | |
| Questionnaire is excellent in all respects | Questionnaire is very good, with a varied range of purposeful questions | Questionnaire is good, with a range of questions | Questionnaire is of questionable quality | Missing or confusing | ||
(max 5) |
Excellent understanding of data collection and analysis relevant to RQ | Very good understanding of data collection and analysis relevant to RQ | Good understanding of data collection and analysis relevant to RQ | Questionable understanding of data collection and analysis relevant to RQ | Missing or confusing | |
Conclusion |
Excellent ‘closing of the loop’ relevant to original intention of the project and resolution of the Research Problem | Very good ‘closing of the loop’ relevant to original intention of the project and resolution of the Research Problem | Good ‘closing of the loop’ relevant to original intention of the project and resolution of the Research Problem | Questionable ‘closing of the loop’ relevant to original intention of the project and resolution of the Research Problem | Missing or confusing | |
| Less Penalties | No statement of who wrote what -10% |
/30 | ||||