Relevant closely connected appropriate the topicexcellent appearance
Reading the web pages below
Do any extra research you feel is necessary
| Report Content | A 1st | B 2.1 | C 2.2 | D 3rd | Fail |
| Quality of extra cited literature Appropriately up‐to‐ date. Relevant and salient1. | Wide range of recent, relevant and salient from literature credible sources. | Good range of recent, relevant and salient from literature credible sources. | Fair number of references although they are mostly not recent, relevant and salient from literature credible sources. | Few sources referenced, only basic texts on a restricted range of subjects. Many are not from recent, relevant and salient from literature credible sources. | Limited referencing. The few that are there add little value to the report. |
| 10% | 7 to 10 | 6 to 7 | 5 to 6 | 3 to 5 | 0‐3 |
| Structure and appearance of report What the report looks like conforms to specifications |
|
|
Acceptable appearance. Main sections have some structure. Could do better diagrams. May not have used template properly. | Appears disorganized. Lacks Overall structure. Either lacks diagrams or they are misleading/ poorly labeled/eye candy diagrams. | Poorly presented. No obvious structure, difficult to work out what is where. Failed to use template. Diagrams ‘eye candy’ rather than explanatory. |
| 10% | 7 to 10 | 6 to 7 | 5 to 6 | 3 to 5 | 0‐3 |
| Readability how easy is it to read and understand this report | Meaning clear and fluent, originality in expression, logical progression and very high quality grammar and expression. | Meaning and text quite clear, Some faults in use of grammar and expression. | Meaning and text fairly not always clea/does not always make the point, Occasional poor use of grammar/voice. | Difficult to read: perhaps because it lacked logical progression OR the use of grammar and expression was very poor. | |
| 10% | 7 to 10 | 6 to 7 | 5 to 6 | 3 to 5 | 0‐3 |
| References: Correct using of citations, references and reference list Adheres to Harvard convention (Name, Date) | Correct use of citations, references are complete including names of all authors, full provenance of sources, and dated on‐line alternatives if appropriate, correct convention | There are a few references that are incomplete or missing information– but references/citations are generally good and complete | Quite a number of errors in the citations and referencing. Some would be difficult to locate based on this information. | Citations flawed ‐ some references incomplete so that it would not be possible to use this information to find them, so their provenance is not clear. | The referencing is mess and it would not be possible to tell the provenance or find the information. |
| 10% |
|
|