The diep model will used critically reflect the themes strengths

The purpose of this assessment is for you to explore your developing understanding of osteopathy and to develop reflective practice skills in preparation for entering the VU student teaching clinic. You will develop your goal setting skills through development of SMART goals that will support your transition into the role of student practitioner in the VU teaching clinics.

This assessment aligns with the unit Learning Outcomes:

INSTRUCTIONS

Use the DIEP model to analyse aspects of your observations, experiences and clinic workbook tasks to write a reflective report. This report should include discussion of the themes; strengths, challenges and opportunities for the future.

You present a case to the clinical supervisor and find it a challenge to discuss the case in a comprehensive and concise manner.

You observe a treating student applying a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) that you are unfamiliar with and you identify this as an opportunity to improve your knowledge of PROMs for a particular condition or patient cohort.

Case history taking

Clinical reasoning skills

Management planning

Clinical practice guidelines

Please use this recording on SMART goal setting to help you to develop your goals.

It is recommended that the following format is used to structure your work:

Here below the criteria rubric for marking , please look to the HD criteria

This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria	Full Marks	HD (80-100%)	Distinction (70-79%)	Credit (60-69%)	Pass (50-59%)	N (0-49%)	Criterion Score
Reflection on strengths	15 points	AND Evaluation demonstrates discerning analysis of the significance of the experience. AND Prose contains an excellent balance of descriptive and reflective writing	AND Evaluation demonstrates analysis of the significance of the experience. AND	AND/OR Evaluation demonstrates an analysis of the experience AND/OR	Reflection includes a description of experience relating to clinical practice AND/OR Planning describes actions with some relation to the reflection	3.8 points Description lacks clarity, is excessively long or lacking relevance to strengths in clinical practice AND/OR Planning is absent or lacking clarity or relevance (0 - 7.4 points)	Score of Reflection on strengths,
Reflection on challenges		Reflection includes a concise description of a specific experience clearly relevant to strengths in clinical practice AND Planning details explicit, realistic and relevant actions which integrate concepts from the description, interpretation and evaluation	Reflection includes a description of a specific experience relating to strengths in clinical practice AND Planning includes explicit and relevant actions directly relating to the reflection	9.8 points Reflection includes a description of an experience relating to strengths in clinical practice AND/OR Planning includes relevant actions relating to the reflection (9 - 10.4 points)	8.3 points Simple interpretation of the experience is apparent. AND/OR Prose contains a descriptive balance of writing without in depth reflection (7.5 - 8.9 points)	Interpretation is absent or lacking clarity or relevance AND/OR Prose is mostly descriptive without adequate reflection
Reflection on opportunities for the future	(15 points)	13.5 points Interpretation demonstrates sophisticated insight explicitly linking to theory, context or personal perception. AND (12 - 14.9 points)	11.3 points Interpretation demonstrates insight relating to theory, context or personal experience AND Prose contains a suitable balance of descriptive and reflective writing (10.5-11.9 points)	Interpretation relates to theory, context or personal perception. AND/OR Prose contains an acceptable balance of descriptive and reflective writing	AND/OR Evaluation of the experience is provided AND/OR	AND/OR Evaluation is absent or lacking clarity or relevance AND/OR	/ 15
SMART goal 1 formulation	10 points	Each of the SMART criteria are addressed accurately and creatively. AND	AND Each of the SMART criteria are addressed accurately	Goal relates to reflections on clinical practice and would result in learning or improvement AND/OR	5.5 points Goal relates to clinical practice	Goal is not appropriate for this level or has little relationship to clinical practice AND/OR	Score of SMART goal 1 formulation, / 10
SMART goal 2 formulation		AND Each of the SMART criteria are addressed accurately and creatively.	Goal relates to reflections on clinical practice and would result in learning and improvement AND	6.5 points Goal relates to reflections on clinical practice and would result in learning or improvement (6 - 6.9 points)	5.5 points	2.5 points Goal is not appropriate for this level or has little relationship to clinical practice (0 - 4.9 points)	Score of SMART goal 2 formulation,
Writing and Grammar		Exceptionally effective, clear and compelling expression and structure with entirely accurate spelling, grammar and use of terminology AND	AND Adherence to the word count.	Adherence to the word count. (3 - 3.4 points)	(2.5 - 2.9 points)	1.3 points Word count not adhered to. (0 - 2.4 points)