The diep model will used critically reflect the themes strengths
The purpose of this assessment is for you to explore your developing understanding of osteopathy and to develop reflective practice skills in preparation for entering the VU student teaching clinic. You will develop your goal setting skills through development of SMART goals that will support your transition into the role of student practitioner in the VU teaching clinics.
This assessment aligns with the unit Learning Outcomes:
INSTRUCTIONS
Use the DIEP model to analyse aspects of your observations, experiences and clinic workbook tasks to write a reflective report. This report should include discussion of the themes; strengths, challenges and opportunities for the future.
You present a case to the clinical supervisor and find it a challenge to discuss the case in a comprehensive and concise manner.
You observe a treating student applying a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) that you are unfamiliar with and you identify this as an opportunity to improve your knowledge of PROMs for a particular condition or patient cohort.
Case history taking
Clinical reasoning skills
Management planning
Clinical practice guidelines
Please use this recording on SMART goal setting to help you to develop your goals.
It is recommended that the following format is used to structure your work:
Here below the criteria rubric for marking , please look to the HD criteria
| Criteria | Full Marks | HD (80-100%) | Distinction (70-79%) | Credit (60-69%) | Pass (50-59%) | N (0-49%) | Criterion Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reflection on strengths | 15 points |
AND
Evaluation demonstrates discerning analysis of the significance of the experience.
AND Prose contains an excellent balance of descriptive and reflective writing |
AND
Evaluation demonstrates analysis of the significance of the experience.
AND
|
AND/OR
Evaluation demonstrates an analysis of the experience
AND/OR |
Reflection includes a description of experience relating to clinical practice
AND/OR
Planning describes actions with some relation to the reflection
|
3.8 points Description lacks clarity, is excessively long or lacking relevance to strengths in clinical practice
AND/OR
Planning is absent or lacking clarity or relevance (0 - 7.4 points) |
Score of Reflection on strengths, |
| Reflection on challenges | Reflection includes a concise description of a specific experience clearly relevant to strengths in clinical practice
AND
Planning details explicit, realistic and relevant actions which integrate concepts from the description, interpretation and evaluation
|
Reflection includes a description of a specific experience relating to strengths in clinical practice
AND
Planning includes explicit and relevant actions directly relating to the reflection
|
9.8 points Reflection includes a description of an experience relating to strengths in clinical practice
AND/OR
Planning includes relevant actions relating to the reflection (9 - 10.4 points) |
8.3 points Simple interpretation of the experience is apparent.
AND/OR
Prose contains a descriptive balance of writing without in depth reflection (7.5 - 8.9 points) |
Interpretation is absent or lacking clarity or relevance
AND/OR
Prose is mostly descriptive without adequate reflection |
||
| Reflection on opportunities for the future | (15 points) |
13.5 points Interpretation demonstrates sophisticated insight explicitly linking to theory, context or personal perception.
AND
(12 - 14.9 points) |
11.3 points Interpretation demonstrates insight relating to theory, context or personal experience
AND
Prose contains a suitable balance of descriptive and reflective writing (10.5-11.9 points) |
Interpretation relates to theory, context or personal perception.
AND/OR
Prose contains an acceptable balance of descriptive and reflective writing |
AND/OR
Evaluation of the experience is provided
AND/OR
|
AND/OR
Evaluation is absent or lacking clarity or relevance
AND/OR |
/ 15 |
| SMART goal 1 formulation | 10 points |
Each of the SMART criteria are addressed accurately and creatively. AND |
AND Each of the SMART criteria are addressed accurately |
Goal relates to reflections on clinical practice and would result in learning or improvement AND/OR |
5.5 points Goal relates to clinical practice |
Goal is not appropriate for this level or has little relationship to clinical practice AND/OR |
Score of SMART goal 1 formulation, / 10 |
| SMART goal 2 formulation | AND Each of the SMART criteria are addressed accurately and creatively. |
Goal relates to reflections on clinical practice and would result in learning and improvement AND |
6.5 points Goal relates to reflections on clinical practice and would result in learning or improvement (6 - 6.9 points) |
5.5 points |
2.5 points Goal is not appropriate for this level or has little relationship to clinical practice (0 - 4.9 points) |
Score of SMART goal 2 formulation, |
|
| Writing and Grammar | Exceptionally effective, clear and compelling expression and structure with entirely accurate spelling, grammar and use of terminology AND |
AND Adherence to the word count. |
Adherence to the word count. (3 - 3.4 points) |
(2.5 - 2.9 points) |
1.3 points Word count not adhered to. (0 - 2.4 points) |