Download as:
Rating : ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Price: $10.99
Language:EN
Pages: 7

Which may subjective local and social variations

This assessment item will assess:
Learning Outcome 4:Apply knowledge of the pathophysiology of disorders of the nervous, immune and musculoskeletal systems to solve clinical problems.

Learning Outcome 3: Apply knowledge of microbiology to selected infectious diseases
Relate the clinical manifestations and diagnostic findings of health deviations to the underlying pathophysiology of disease states.

• An interpretation of ALL the patient risk factors (from the case-study scenario) and a demonstration of how these risk factors link and relate to the diagnosed disease/disorders’ aetiology, using evidence-based literature.

• A step-by-step pathophysiological sequence between the diagnosed disease/disorders’ aetiology and ALL the patient’s clinical manifestations (from the case-study scenario), using evidence-based literature.

Explain how ALL the patient’s risk factors (from the case-study scenario) are linked to the

diagnosed disease’s/disorder’s pathophysiological process/s.

diagnosed disease/disorder.

2804NRS Human Pathophysiology and Pharmacology 1 A2 Written Assignment – Concept map assignment

2

Please note the marker will cease marking your submitted work once they have reached 750

words.

(between 2011 – 2021 (inclusive).

• Use the referencing style.

2804NRS Human Pathophysiology and Pharmacology 1
A2 Written Assignment: Concept map assignment

Concept Map Section
ACCOMPLISHED
High quality performance or
standard of learning achievement.
TOTAL MARK

Criterion One
An interpretation of the
three patient’s risk factors (from the case-study
scenario) and a
demonstration of how
these risk factors link and relate to the diagnosed

disease/disorder’s
aetiology in the concept map.

Satisfactory standard as evidenced by an adequate interpretation of some of the patient risk factors.

Some links between the risk factors

/6
Mark allocation 6-5.5 5-4 3.5-2.5 <2

patient’s clinical
manifestations (from the
case-study scenario) in the concept map.

Exceptionally high standard as
evidenced by a logical step by step pathophysiological sequence
between the diagnosed

patient’s clinical manifestations evident in the concept map.

Satisfactory standard as evidenced by an inconsistent step by step
pathophysiological sequence
between the diagnosed
disease/disorder’s aetiology and the

/6
Mark allocation 6-5.5 5 -4 3.5-2.5 <2

Assessable
Elements

ACCOMPLISHED
High quality performance or
standard of learning achievement.
TOTAL MARK

disease’s/disorder’s
pathophysiological
sequence in the concept map.

Exceptionally high standard as
evidenced by an accurate
interpretation of the five patient’s clinical manifestations. Clear links between the five clinical
manifestations and the
disease’s/disorder’s
pathophysiological sequence in the concept map.

Unsatisfactory standard as
evidenced by an inaccurate or absent interpretation of the

patient’s clinical manifestations. Links between the clinical
manifestations and the

/10
Mark allocation 10 – 9 8.5 – 6.5 6 – 4.5 4 – 1

High quality standard as evidenced by an accurate identificationof the appropriate pharmacological
approach and treatment modalities for the patient diagnosis, with most links evident in the concept map.

Satisfactory standard as evidenced by an accurate identificationof the appropriate pharmacological
approach and treatment modalities for the patient diagnosis, with some links evident in the concept map.

/9
Mark allocation 9 – 7.5 7 –5.5 5 – 3.5 3 – 1

High quality standard as evidenced by an accurate identificationof the appropriate diagnostic investigations for the patient diagnosis, with most links evident in the concept map.

Satisfactory standard as evidenced by an accurate identificationof the diagnostic investigations for the
patient diagnosis, with some links evident in the concept map.

/9
Mark allocation 9 – 7.5 7 – 5.5 5 – 3.5 3 – 1
750-word Written Section

Exceptionally high standard as evidenced by an accurate
explanation of how the three
patient’s risk factors are linked to

the diagnosed disease’s/disorder’s pathophysiological process/s.

/9
Mark allocation 9 – 7.5 7 – 5.5 5 – 3.5 3 – 1

Criterion Seven Explain how the

disease’s/disorder’s
pathophysiology manifests to produce the five patient’s clinical manifestations
(from the case-study
scenario).

Satisfactory standard as evidenced by a brief, but sufficient explanation of how the disease’s/disorder’s
pathophysiology manifests to
produce some of the patient’s clinical manifestations.

Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by an inadequate explanation of how the

/15
Mark allocation 15 – 12 11.5 – 7.5 7 – 5.5 5 – 1

Satisfactory standard as evidenced by a brief, but sufficient justification of how some of the pharmacological approach and treatment modalities in terms of their relevance and
appropriateness for the diagnosed disease/disorder.

Unsatisfactory standard as
evidenced by an inadequate justification of the
pharmacological approach and treatment modalities in terms of their relevance and
appropriateness for the
diagnosed disease/disorder.

/9
Mark allocation 9 – 7.5 7 – 5.5 5 – 3.5 3 – 1

Unsatisfactory standard as
evidenced by an inadequate justification of the diagnostic investigations in terms of their relevance and appropriateness for the diagnosed
disease/disorder.

/9
Mark allocation 9 – 7.5 7 – 5.5 5 – 3.5 3 – 1
Presentation and Referencing

Does not comply with academic writing standards;
Poor sentence and paragraph structure, and poor logical flow demonstratesan inability to
communicate ideas effectively.

/6
Mark allocation 6 – 5.5 5 – 4 3.5 – 2.5 <2

Criterion Eleven
Use of the literature.

/8
8 – 6.5 6 – 4.5 4 – 2.5 2 – 1

Criterion Twelve Referencing.

Exceptionally high standard as
evidenced by exemplary use of APA 7 format in-text and reference list with no errors.

/4
Mark allocation 4 3 2 0.5 – 1
TOTAL /100
Copyright © 2009-2023 UrgentHomework.com, All right reserved.