ENEE20001-Advanced Power System Analysis and Control
You are to investigate the connection of a large 550MW solar farm at Bulli Creek in Queensland. Billi Creek is the bus 408 labelled QNINTH. You are to investigate the options of solar PV or solar thermal and the viability of three different forms of storage – battery, pumped hydro and molten salt.
You are to
- address all connection clauses of the NER, as listed in section S5.2.5 technical requirements as found on page 537 of version 71 of the NER.
- With solar thermal select a suitable H constant for the synchonrous generator and a suitable exciter performing tuning of the exciter. If necessary a power system stabiliser may need to be considered for the solar thermal plant.
- Investigate the effect of displacing existing synchronous generation with solar thermal generation. In particular effects on relavant critical clearing times and rate of change of frequency (ROCOF) following disturbances. You will need to be aware of the operation of power system in particulat ROCOF relays.
- Research power quality effects of solar thermal and solar PV and make recommendations. This will form part of your work in assessing the connection clauses of the NER.
- Discuss social, environmental and economic (market ) impacts of the new installation. A knowledge of the Australian electricity market is essential and will be covered in lectures.
Answer:
The progress report is to carefully analyses the issues (problems) associated the connection of a large 550MW solar thermal farm at Bulli Creek in Queensland that is located in the northern end of Queensland New South Wales Interconnectors(Turner, 2004). In this progress report, the designers should define the size of the installation area of the solar thermal plant. In the connection of the solar thermal plant(Drucker, 1976, Karnaukhov and Goldshtein, 2003), there are some issues in which the contractors need to avoid these issues which are encountered in the constructions(Kalogirou, 2004). These issues are due to the ignorance of the standards which are required for the best connection of the projects(Tsoutsos et al., 2005). The project team needs to undertake some feasibility study to ensure that the construction of the project operates as required by the team. The team project management can perfectly undertake their progress of the project as below(Zarza et al., 2006);
Technical Progress
The technical progress of the project is the main area where the project team should undertake with the greatest (Pehnt, 2006)care to enhance the success of the project(Uzsoy et al., 1992). This is basically ensured by doing some simulations(Price, 2003). The simulation is done and this is illustrated as in the following procedure as shown in the diagram below(Golparvar-Fard et al., 2009);
After the simulation of the installation of the solar thermal generation plant can be obtained in the following graph(Kisiel et al., 2006)
Electro-Optical Characteristic for the solar can be illustrated in the table below (Vanlaeke et al., 2006)
In the simulation process for the solar can be shown in the following diagram(Duffie and Beckman, 2013)
Fig: Showing solar plant series Simulin
k Model (Ropp and Gonzalez, 2009)
In the simulation of the whole power plant the setup which the team management should consider can be illustrated in the diagram below(Flin et al., 2002, Manenti and Ravaghi-Ardebili, 2013);
Fig; Showing the whole plant simulation (Herrmann et al., 2004)
For the team manager they need to calculate the amount of energy produced from the solar energy which will be employed to warm the water to produce the steam(Montes et al., 2009). This is done by the following formula(Herrmann et al., 2004)
E=A ×r× H× PR . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Where E = Energy (kWh), A = Total solar panel Area (m2), r = solar panel yield or efficiency, H = Annual average solar radiation on tilted panels the shading parts are not included and PR = Performance ratio, the coefficient for losses(Schlaich, 1995).
The meteorological data can be provided to the software in a five minutes resolution(Al Shamisi et al., 2011, Schlaich et al., 2005). And for this it can be shown by the following controller algorithm;
Fig: Showing a control algorithm. equation (Katzenstein and Apt, 2008)
And the efficiency of the production is illustrated by the following equation (Katzenstein and Apt, 2008)
?= . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
And during the installation there are some issues which are associated with the installation, these must be completely dealt with (Chu and Majumdar, 2012, Pretorius and Kröger, 2006, Suresh et al., 2010, Mills, 2010). A large generating station like this face challenges like an insufficient fund(Hill et al., 2012). Thermal solar always uses very expensive semiconductor materials which generate electrical energy from solar energy(Aragonés-Beltrán et al., 2014). It is as well expensive to keep such large firm running (Miralas, 2012). (Zhang et al., 2013).
The team management should ensure a correct connection of the solar plants(Reddy et al., 2013, Behar et al., 2013) to ensure that the issues like accidents(Singh, 2013) and poor working of the components(Tsoutsos et al., 2005). In the connection, the heat generated from the solar PV is directed to the steam boiler which is then employed in the rotation of the turbines(Carrasco et al., 2006). These turbines are coupled to the generators which are used to generate electrical energy(Crabtree and Lewis, 2007). With the correct arrangement of these components, problems like bursting of pipes due to higher pressure from the steam-water can eradicate(Herrmann and Kearney, 2002). In some cases, there may be less amount of heat generated by the solar plant due to wrong types of solar (Avila-Marin et al., 2013)PV used and to eradicate this problem parabolic solar PV are employed to help concentrate(Xu et al., 2011, Pickhardt and Da Silva, 1998) the amount of heat generated(Denholm and Margolis, 2007). This will help to eradicate the issues of less amount of heat produced which will hence require a supplement of heat via heating(Dersch et al., 2004).
Project Management And Team Management
For a better management of this project, the team members need to ensure a perfect communication between them to come into agreement on some issues (Gareis, 2002)which may fully hinder the perfect operation of the project(Scott-Young and Samson, 2008). The team management should perfectly manage the project through proper usage of funds in the project as well as perfect communication between them(Guthrie et al., 1999). The main issue which the team should look at first is the attainment of a clear land where there is no hindrance to the solar illumination(Turney and Fthenakis, 2011). Albeit the team management won’t avoid these problems from occurring (Baomingr) but the team management will get a cordial solution for this problem that arises in the progress of this project (Evans et al., 2009). Hence by discussion between them, the issues which occur will be solved (Gladieux and Sadhu, 2007) and this will make the project done impeccably(Burke, 2013).
PROPOSED PLAN FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT
Having a perfect proposed plan which will help the team management to complete the project is very significant for this project(Raz and Michael, 2001). This is because with the proposed plan the team management will do as per their plan and they can eliminate these issues which occur during the installation of the project(Grafton, 2011).
First Phase: (16/03/18 )
Getting agreement from the legal authority to help in the attainment of land for the construction of the project(Dvir and Lechler, 2004).
Second Phase: ( 30/03/18)
Order the components required for the installation of the project and then install them(Henderson-Sellers et al., 1995).
Third Phase: (30/04/18)
Testing of the project software to check if the proposed project works perfectly for the prototype(Heller et al., 2006).
Fourth Phase: (20/05/18)
After doing the software testing the real project is then installed and check for the functionality(Thiam et al., 2017)
Fifth Phase: (2/06/18)
Workers will then be trained perfectly on how they will operate the whole system during the operation (Nelson et al., 1995) and the whole project will then be implemented(Hennecke et al., 2008).
References
AL SHAMSI, M. H., ASSI, A. H. & HEJASE, H. A. 2011. Using MATLAB to develop artificial neural network models for predicting global solar radiation in Al Ain City–UAE. Engineering education and research using MATLAB. InTech.
ARAGONÉS-BELTRÁN, P., CHAPARRO-GONZÁLEZ, F., PASTOR-FERRANDO, J.-P. & PLA-RUBIO, A. 2014. An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects. Energy, 66, 222-238.
AVILA-MARIN, A. L., FERNANDEZ-RECHE, J. & TELLEZ, F. M. 2013. Evaluation of the potential of central receiver solar power plants: configuration, optimization, and trends. Applied energy, 112, 274-288.
BAOMINGR, L. Engineering Management: the human-4tehologyinteface.
BEHAR, O., KHALAF, A. & MOHAMMEDI, K. 2013. A review of studies on central receiver solar thermal power plants. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 23, 12-39.
BIRNBAUM, J., ECK, M., FICHTNER, M., HIRSCH, T., LEHMANN, D. & ZIMMERMANN, G. 2010. A direct steam generation solar power plant with integrated thermal storage. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 132, 031014.
BOSCH, J. L. & KLEISSL, J. 2013. Cloud motion vectors from a network of ground sensors in a solar power plant. Solar Energy, 95, 13-20.
BURKE, R. 2013. Project management: planning and control techniques. New Jersey, USA.
CARRASCO, J. M., TRANQUILO, L. G., BIALASIEWICZ, J. T., GALVÁN, E., PORTILLOGUISADO, R. C., PRATS, M. M., LEÓN, J. I. & MORENO-ALFONSO, N. 2006. Power-electronic systems for the grid integration of renewable energy sources: A survey. IEEE Transactions on industrial electronics, 53, 1002-1016.
CHU, S. & MAJUMDAR, A. 2012. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. nature, 488, 294.
CRABTREE, G. W. & LEWIS, N. S. 2007. Solar energy conversion. Physics today, 60, 37-42.
DENHOLM, P. & MARGOLIS, R. M. 2007. Evaluating the limits of solar photovoltaics (PV) in traditional electric power systems. Energy policy, 35, 2852-2861.
DERSCH, J., GEYER, M., HERRMANN, U., JONES, S. A., KELLY, B., KISTNER, R., ORTMANNS, W., PITZ-PAAL, R. & PRICE, H. 2004. Trough integration into power plants—a study on the performance and economy of integrated solar combined cycle systems. Energy, 29, 947-959.
DRUCKER, E. R. 1976. Solar power plant. Google Patents.
DUFFIE, J. A. & BECKMAN, W. A. 2013. Solar engineering of thermal processes, John Wiley & Sons.
DVIR, D. & LECHLER, T. 2004. Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: the impact of changes on project success. Research Policy, 33, 1-15.
EVANS, A., STREZOV, V. & EVANS, T. J. 2009. Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13, 1082-1088.
FLIN, R., O'CONNOR, P. & MEARNS, K. 2002. Crew resource management: improving team work in high-reliability industries. Team performance management: an international journal, 8, 68-78.
GARCÍA, I. L., ÁLVAREZ, J. L. & BLANCO, D. 2011. Performance model for parabolic trough solar thermal power plants with thermal storage: Comparison to operating plant data. Solar Energy, 85, 2443-2460.
GAREIS, R. Professional project portfolio management. IPMA World Congress, Berlin, 2002. 4.
GLADIEUX, T. F. & SADHU, A. 2007. Automating document reviews in a project management system. Google Patents.
GOLPARVAR-FARD, M., PEÑA-MORA, F., ARBOLEDA, C. A. & LEE, S. 2009. Visualization of construction progress monitoring with 4D simulation model overlaid on time-lapsed photographs. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 23, 391-404.
GRAFTON, R. Q. 2011. 14. Economic Costs and Benefits of the Proposed Basin Plan. Basin Futures, 245.
GUTHRIE, J., OLSON, O. & HUMPHREY, C. 1999. Debating developments in new public financial management: the limits of global theorizing and some new ways forward. Financial Accountability & Management, 15, 209-228.
HELLER, P., PFÄNDER, M., DENK, T., TELLEZ, F., VALVERDE, A., FERNANDEZ, J. & RING, A. 2006. Test and evaluation of a solar-powered gas turbine system. Solar Energy, 80, 1225-1230.
HENDERSON-SELLERS, A., PITMAN, A., LOVE, P., IRANNEJAD, P. & CHEN, T. 1995. The project for intercomparison of land surface parameterization schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 76, 489-503.
HENNECKE, K., SCHWARZBÖZL, P., KOLL, G., BEUTER, M., HOFFSCHMIDT, B., GÖTTSCHE, J. & HARTZ, T. The solar power Tower Jülich—a solar thermal power plant for test and demonstration of air receiver technology. Proceedings of ISES World Congress 2007 (Vol. I–Vol. V), 2008. Springer, 1749-1753.
HERRMANN, U. & KEARNEY, D. W. 2002. Survey of thermal energy storage for parabolic trough power plants. Journal of solar energy engineering, 124, 145-152.
HERRMANN, U., KELLY, B. & PRICE, H. 2004. Two-tank molten salt storage for parabolic trough solar power plants. Energy, 29, 883-893.
HILL, C. A., SUCH, M. C., CHEN, D., GONZALEZ, J. & GRADY, W. M. 2012. Battery energy storage for enabling integration of distributed solar power generation. IEEE Transactions on smart grid, 3, 850-857.
KALOGIROU, S. A. 2004. Solar thermal collectors and applications. Progress in energy and combustion science, 30, 231-295.
KARNAUKHOV, A. & GOLDSHTEIN, Y. 2003. Solar power plant. Google Patents.
KATZENSTEIN, W. & APT, J. 2008. Air emissions due to the wind and solar power. ACS Publications.
KISIEL, A., TA?U?, T., BRONIKOWSKI, W. & FLORKOWSKI, W. 2006. TERMINATOR: Thermal heavy-ion generator. Computer Physics Communications, 174, 669-687.
MANENTI, F. & RAVAGHI-ARDEBILI, Z. 2013. Dynamic simulation of concentrating solar power plant and two-tanks direct thermal energy storage. Energy, 55, 89-97.
MILLS, A. 2010. Implications of wide-area geographic diversity for the short-term variability of solar power.
MIRALLES, J. 2012. Electrotechnology for Development, Birmingham, IEEE.
MONTES, M., ABÁNADES, A., MARTINEZ-VAL, J. & VALDÉS, M. 2009. Solar multiple optimizations for a solar-only thermal power plant, using oil as heat transfer fluid in the parabolic trough collectors. Solar Energy, 83, 2165-2176.
NELSON, R. R., WHITENER, E. M. & PHILCOX, H. H. 1995. The assessment of end-user training needs. Communications of the ACM, 38, 27-39.
PEHNT, M. 2006. Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies. Renewable energy, 31, 55-71.
PICKHARDT, R. & DA SILVA, R. N. Application of a nonlinear predictive controller to a solar power plant. Control Applications, 1998. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on, 1998. IEEE, 6-10.
PRETORIUS, J. & KRÖGER, D. 2006. Critical evaluation of solar chimney power plant performance. Solar Energy, 80, 535-544.
PRICE, H. A parabolic trough solar power plant simulation model. ASME 2003 International Solar Energy Conference, 2003. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 665-673.
RAMEZ, J. 2013. The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a Finite Planet, Stoke, UPNE.
RAZ, T. & MICHAEL, E. 2001. Use and benefits of tools for project risk management. International journal of project management, 19, 9-17.
REDDY, V. S., KAUSHIK, S., RANJAN, K. & TYAGI, S. 2013. State-of-the-art of solar thermal power plants—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 258-273.
ROPP, M. E. & GONZALEZ, S. 2009. Development of a MATLAB/Simulink model of a single-phase grid-connected photovoltaic system. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 24, 195-202.
SCHLAICH, J. 1995. The solar chimney: electricity from the sun, Edition Axel Menges.
SCHLAICH, J., BERGMANN, R., SCHIEL, W. & WEINREBE, G. 2005. Design of commercial solar updraft tower systems—utilization of solar induced convective flows for power generation. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 127, 117-124.
SCOTT-YOUNG, C. & SAMSON, D. 2008. Project success and project team management: Evidence from capital projects in the process industries. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 749-766.
SINGH, G. K. 2013. Solar power generation by PV (photovoltaic) technology: A review. Energy, 53, 1-13.
SURESH, M., REDDY, K. & KOLAR, A. K. 2010. 4-E (Energy, Energy, Environment, and Economic) analysis of solar thermal aided coal-fired power plants. Energy for sustainable development, 14, 267-279.
THIAM, A., MBOW, C., FAYE, M., STOUFFS, P. & AZILINON, D. 2017. Assessment of Hybrid Concentrated Solar Power-Biomass Plant Generation Potential in the Sahel: Case Study of Senegal. Natural Resources, 8, 531.
TSOUTSOS, T., FRANTZESKAKI, N. & GEKAS, V. 2005. Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies. Energy Policy, 33, 289-296.
TURNER, J. A. 2004. Sustainable hydrogen production. Science, 305, 972-974.
TURNEY, D. & FTHENAKIS, V. 2011. Environmental impacts from the installation and operation of large-scale solar power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 3261-3270.
UZSOY, R., LEE, C.-Y. & MARTIN-VEGA, L. A. 1992. A review of production planning and scheduling models in the semiconductor industry part I: system characteristics, performance evaluation, and production planning. IIE Transactions, 24, 47-60.
VANLAEKE, P., SWINNEN, A., HALDERMAN, I., VAN HOLLAND, G., AERNOUTS, T., CHEYNS, D., DEIBEL, C., D'HAEN, J., HEREMANS, P. & POORTMANS, J. 2006. P3HT/PCBM bulk heterojunction solar cells: Relation between morphology and electro-optical characteristics. Solar energy materials and solar cells, 90, 2150-2158.
XU, C., WANG, Z., LI, X. & SUN, F. 2011. Energy and exergy analysis of solar power tower plants. Applied Thermal Engineering, 31, 3904-3913.
ZARZA, E., ROJAS, M. E., GONZALEZ, L., CABALLERO, J. M. & RUEDA, F. 2006. INDITEP: The first pre-commercial DSG solar power plant. Solar Energy, 80, 1270-1276.
ZHANG, H., BAEYENS, J., DEGRÈVE, J. & CACÈRES, G. 2013. Concentrated solar power plants: Review and design methodology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 466-481.
Buy ENEE20001-Advanced Power System Analysis and Control Answers Online
Talk to our expert to get the help with ENEE20001-Advanced Power System Analysis and Control Answers to complete your assessment on time and boost your grades now
The main aim/motive of the management assignment help services is to get connect with a greater number of students, and effectively help, and support them in getting completing their assignments the students also get find this a wonderful opportunity where they could effectively learn more about their topics, as the experts also have the best team members with them in which all the members effectively support each other to get complete their diploma assignments. They complete the assessments of the students in an appropriate manner and deliver them back to the students before the due date of the assignment so that the students could timely submit this, and can score higher marks. The experts of the assignment help services at urgenthomework.com are so much skilled, capable, talented, and experienced in their field of programming homework help writing assignments, so, for this, they can effectively write the best economics assignment help services.
