GOV 1101 American Government: Congressional Committees

President Congress

With the elevated record of Congressional partisanship along with the low rated Congressional sanction, the First Branch should obtain deformation into significant consideration. It must be noted that the two recent white papers evaluating the House and the Senate has shed light on the distinctiveness of the issue. It is significant to understand that the American electorate is in conformity except its disapproval with the Congressional dysfunction. It has been further reviewed that the voters have an increased rate of disapproval in comparison to accepting their own specific political representatives. Several reports demonstrate that Congress has been incompetent in its role. As a result, it experiences an increased rate of partition separate than ever, where by zero congressional Republicans reflect more liberalism than the democrats and for the zero Democrats show more traditionalist than the Republicans.

At this juncture, it is significant to note that the committee in development during the early and middle of 20th century was considered as one of the primary factors of the institutionalization of the House. The Committee chairmanship in mid century was almost considerably resolute by the level of seniority further signifying the rule centric operations of an institutionalized chamber. However, the number of committee chairmanships was recorded to reach over 3% in the 1950s and around 1.1% during the 1960s. Though there had been a partial due to the Democrats replacement of conservative Southern committee chairs, the committee chairmanships were not granted by precedence had risen above 15% in the 1970s. Furthermore, they proceeded to achieve over 32% in the 2000 and an astounding development of over 63% in current years. However with the decline of committees in Prestige, the rate of party committees had witnessed a rapid increase. Despite of the overall house expenditures along with the staff began to become dormant during the 1980s and for the decline since the 1990s, the party leadership has been defended it from these reductions. Senate leadership alike the House direction has been achieving enhanced authority in recent times. It is further to note that majority leader of the Senate has employed Senate precedent about the modifications in order to govern the deliberation procedures. Though it has been noted that the presidential regulations gave rise in order to increase deliberation and systematic functioning of the Senate, the Senate leadership at present utilizes them in order to prevent amendments and modifications that they oppose from being introduced to the floor. The Senate School that prohibited third degree revisions along with the precedent resulted to be created as the amendment ‘feeling free’ item that signifies the outline of potential amendments incorporations, removals, substitutions, amendments to amendments. It is to take in account that the US public further expresses grief for the insufficiency of congressional responsibility for its incompetence to achieve goals and is immensely disappointed by its impenetrability.

However, the American voters are neither acquainted nor eager of arena type legislature in the framework of the United Kingdom. Voters have expressed their views to perceive their representatives to work productively in order to develop, establish, argue and pass legislation rather than simply express their perceptions and thoughts on legislation that is developed by external interest groups.

References

Fukuyama, Francis. "America in decay: The sources of political dysfunction." Foreign Aff. 93 (2014): 5.

Oleszek, Walter J. Congressional procedures and the policy process. Sage, 2014.

Smith, Peter H. Labyrinths of power: political recruitment in twentieth-century Mexico. Princeton University Press, 2015.

Volden, Craig, Alan E. Wiseman, and Dana E. Wittmer. "When are women more effective lawmakers than men?." American Journal of Political Science 57, no. 2 (2013): 326-341.