HET301A Chance of Causing Injury
Information section.
This assessment must be submitted in compliance with the following:
1. All submissions must be uploaded to the learning portal. No email or hard copies will be accepted.
2. Assessment to be referenced in the APA style, both in-text and in a reference list. References to ‘Wikipedia’ or similar unsubstantiated sources will not be accepted.
3. In the event of serious illness or unusual circumstances, a student may apply for Special Consideration in accordance with the rules and regulations governing this application, but it is important that such requests be made as
soon as the circumstance is known.
Answer:
There are certain key facts of the incident that has made the incident one of the near-missed fatal incident of the recent times.
It caused a major impact upon the stakeholders
The incident type was a fire breakout from a dryer at a hotel in Yass, Australia. There were no fatal injury as the fire control team with three fire control and rescue trucks made the whole situation under control and saved the lives of both the guests who were in the hotel as well as the staff member of the hotel who were working in it in all the departments.
Parties to the incident
There were no such victims of the incident as the place was evacuated within the specified time period by the staff of the hotel. Moreover, the fire department reached the hotel within the specified time period making the whole process of fire control easier and less time consuming.
Was the incident foreseeable
The incident was absolutely not foreseeable as the according to the staffs and the managers of the hotel, the dryer that was the source of the fire was in a perfect working condition with no hint or implication that the dryer would cause fire in the hotel premises.
Consequences or impact of the incident to all parties
The impact of the fire case was differently on the various kinds of parties in the fire case. The impact of the incident was medium to low on the various parties associated with it. The two parties associated with it are hotels and the customers who are impacted in two different ways. Due to the fire sourced from the dryer, the part of the hotel adjacent to the room could have been subjected to serious damage. Due to the prompt action of the staffs, the majority portion could be saved from the debacle (Boyle, 2015).
The hotel suffered minor losses in the overall incidents with no causalities reported both from the customer as well as the staff end. The customers were also not that effected in the overall incident as the fire did not reach the portions of the hotel that the customers were using which made the customers get least affected by the overall fire incident that affected the hotels as well as the customers of the hotel (Reason, 2016). The consequences of the fire resulted in making the hotel more prone to safety measures and imply some of the basic protective and anti-hazards measures that made the overall activity of the hotels more prone to safety
?One of the most important steps of making a risk mitigation plan is to identify the risk that is about to occur. The identification of the risk plays a major role in making the overall action and prevention of the procedure easy. The failure of the staffs and management to identify the risk associated with the dryer and the fire that is being caused by it is one of the major reasons why the identification of risk is a must.
The analysis of the risk is again one of the most pivotal steps of the overall process (Boyle, 2015). The analysing part of the risk makes sure the amount of risk that can be caused by the probable trouble and the losses that can occur due to this. The successful analyse of the risk at the hotel at the right time saved a huge amount of time and lives and the fire at Yass never turned to be fatal.
Review or Monitoring of Risk –
The review and monitoring of the task should be done after the whole process of the task have been done so that the further same consequences can be handled with prior basis. In addition, the monitoring of the task should be done so that the future risks associated with the same kind of situation is made under control and given approximate measures to eliminate the threat associated with it (Hopkin, 2017).
?Elimination – Physically removing the hazards which is one of the main options for the case and for the general risks that are associated with safety.
?Substitution – Replacement of a hazardous element or object with something that is safer compared to the former. The method of substitution is the second most important method in the whole matter
?Engineering Control – This method does not prevent hazards but eliminate the people from venturing into hazardous situations. Implementing good engineering costs to the implementation of the safety is definitely the third method in the case.
?Administrative Control – The changing of the way of working for the people by using safer and easy to use means is definitely one of the major ways in which the administrative control can be implied. The administrative control is definitely one of the major ways to control the risk and hazard management
?Personal Protective Equipment’s – Every person should possess some of the basic protective equipment that can be used for their personal safety when in times of need. The importance of such a kind of equipment though is immense in personal use, serves no concrete results for the overall risk management.
Applicable for the case
Taking the help of the Risk Control Hierarchy, the risk management of the hotel could have been done in a number of ways. The process and ways in which the hierarchy of the risk control is to be applied can be stated in the various ways.
The hotel can eliminate the various risk causing elements and can also make sure that each of the elements that can cause of the amount of danger should be physically checked and cross checked so that the risk allocated for the same can be ignored.
References
?Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13.
?Khan, F., Rathnayaka, S., & Ahmed, S. (2015). Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 98, 116-147.
?Aven, T. (2015). Risk analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
?Omidvari, M., Mansouri, N., & Nouri, J. (2015). A pattern of fire risk assessment and emergency management in educational center laboratories. Safety science, 73, 34-42.
?Boyle, T. (2015). Health and safety: risk management. Routledge.
?Reason, J. (2016). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Routledge.
?Glendon, A. I., Clarke, S., & McKenna, E. (2016). Human safety and risk management. Crc Press.
?Hopkin, P. (2017). Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers.
Buy HET301A Chance of Causing Injury Answers Online
Talk to our expert to get the help with HET301A Chance of Causing Injury Answers to complete your assessment on time and boost your grades now
The main aim/motive of the management assignment help services is to get connect with a greater number of students, and effectively help, and support them in getting completing their assignments the students also get find this a wonderful opportunity where they could effectively learn more about their topics, as the experts also have the best team members with them in which all the members effectively support each other to get complete their diploma assignments. They complete the assessments of the students in an appropriate manner and deliver them back to the students before the due date of the assignment so that the students could timely submit this, and can score higher marks. The experts of the assignment help services at urgenthomework.com are so much skilled, capable, talented, and experienced in their field of programming homework help writing assignments, so, for this, they can effectively write the best economics assignment help services.
