Hist 170 American History : Assessment Answers
Part I
In consideration of the Median Voter Model, and based only upon the information contained in the readings for this assignment and only the first two data columns of the table (i.e. “Rating of Prevalence of Moderates” and “Estimated Obama Advantage...”), which states would you advise your chosen campaigner to visit the greatest number of times in order to increase Obama's chances of winning as many of the nine swing states as possible? Why? Which states would be least advantageous for your team to visit? Why? Be sure to explain in very explicit terms just how your reasons relate to the Median Voter Model and also consider the “Estimated Obama Advantage...”. Please also read the next paragraph before starting. Please note that this assignment presents a scenario that is designed to be fun while allowing you to explore an application of the Median Voter Model. While its storyline follows the actual 2012 presidential election (and it uses only real data), in this case your sole goal is to win as many of the nine swing states as possible. For you, Mr. Axelrod, each of the nine states is of equal value.
In other words, you are to ignore the fact that in the real world they have disparate electoral vote values. Another necessary simplification is that your analysis should not consider the distance between states nor the time needed for transportation to or between them. Also, each visit is considered to be for an equal amount of time and there is no other method available (e.g. TV ads, robocalling, etc.) that you can manipulate to influence how voters vote. Similarly, inclement weather (e.g.
Part II
It is now late February, 2013, and president Obama is already a month into his second term.
Annoyed by VP Joe Biden's daily insistence that you join him in drinking flat champagne left- over from the second inaugural ball4 and wear leftover balloon-animal hats, you, Mr. Axelrod, have resigned your position in the Obama administration and begun your new job as a senior political analyst at NBC News and MSNBC. Your producers have asked you to give your views regarding the strategic triumphs and blunders of each the Obama and Romney campaigns specifically and only regarding the choices they made about which swing states each candidate’s campaign team would visit and how many times during the five-day period preceding election day in 2012, that is, November 1-5, 2012. Before you begin, you may find it helpful to come up with an estimate of each campaign's performance in the nine swing states during that period of time. As a suggestion, you might do that by calculating the difference between the “Estimated Obama Advantage...” before that week and the “Obama Actual Margin of Victory,” which is the result from the actual election, for each state. Then adjust your resulting figures for each state by dividing each by the greater number of visits made by one candidate's team compared to that of his opponent.
With the benefit of hindsight, does it seem that either campaign could have made better choices about which states to visit? How so, and why? Were there any choices that seemed to have paid off? How so, and why? (Remember that in our case we have adopted a simplified version of reality by considering the only measure of success to be that of winning as many of the swing states as possible. As such, a 0.001% margin of victory in a state gains the victor a whole state but, conversely, losing by that same tiny margin is a loss of the whole state. So, the fact that a particular candidate may have nearly caught up to his opponent in the waning days of the campaign by visiting a state many times did not help at all if he nevertheless lost the state.
Answer:
Introduction:
Anthony Downs in 1957 put forward a rational calculus of voting, which has inspired later works on the same. His significant conclusion was that a rational voter must never bother to vote. This conclusion of Downs, reallocated the concentration of contemporary political scientists from the explanation of why people do not vote to the explanation of why they do. It is referred to as the Downs Model or Median Voter Model (Downs 1957).
Applications of Median Voter Model
Part I
As the chief campaign strategist, recommendation of visiting the states of Ohio and Nevada would be put forward. As per results, Ohio has the maximum number of moderate voters. The numbers are quite high for this state, rated 9.5 in prevalence. The state also has a good estimate of advantage in the week prior to the elections, with 3.6 in percentage points. In the context of the Median Voter Model, for winning the election, the voters have to see the candidates on a left-to-right continuum. Moreover, the voters choose the candidates whose views are the closest to their own (Portmann and Stadelmann 2013). In the United States, both the Democratic and Republican parties have primaries, in which the party members select the extremists from their respective party (Sinclair 2014). In such cases, most of the times, the running candidates in the primaries would reveal themselves as somewhat being more extremist in their demonstrations for satisfying the voters, as voting in the primaries is generally limited to party affiliates. Subsequently, the winning candidates put forward more moderate stances as means of appealing to voters counted in the other party. So visiting Ohio would prove profitable for the campaign as the maximum number of people are voters and winning their confidence would secure a huge number of votes for the party. Apart from that the next state can definitely be Nevada. It has a high rating of moderates’ prevalence, second to Ohio, and the second highest percentage in estimated advantage, after Wisconsin. Colorado has the lowest rating of prevalence of moderates and almost a poor estimated advantage in the week before election. In case of lowest estimated advantage, Florida scores a straight 0, making both Colorado and Florida not so beneficial of the states to visit.
Part II
|
Difference |
Obama Visits |
Romney Visits |
Colorado |
2.2 |
0.3 |
0.22 |
Florida |
0.9 |
0.1 |
0.09 |
Iowa |
2.4 |
0.3 |
0.24 |
Nevada |
2.1 |
0.3 |
0.21 |
New |
2.3 |
0.3 |
0.23 |
Hampshire |
|
|
|
North |
-0.5 |
-0.07 |
-0.05 |
Carolina |
|
|
|
Ohio |
-1.7 |
-0.2 |
0.17 |
Virginia |
1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Wisconsin |
1.2 |
0.1 |
0.12 |
Buy Hist 170 American History : Assessment Answers Online
Talk to our expert to get the help with Hist 170 American History : Assessment Answers to complete your assessment on time and boost your grades now
The main aim/motive of the management assignment help services is to get connect with a greater number of students, and effectively help, and support them in getting completing their assignments the students also get find this a wonderful opportunity where they could effectively learn more about their topics, as the experts also have the best team members with them in which all the members effectively support each other to get complete their diploma assignments. They complete the assessments of the students in an appropriate manner and deliver them back to the students before the due date of the assignment so that the students could timely submit this, and can score higher marks. The experts of the assignment help services at urgenthomework.com are so much skilled, capable, talented, and experienced in their field of programming homework help writing assignments, so, for this, they can effectively write the best economics assignment help services.