FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
Internet Case Study: AgriChem Corporation
Case Study
Operation Research IE 311
Introduction
In June 1980 the general manager of Texas Harry Sinclair received a notification from Ben Elliot that there is a shortage of natural gas in the Houston area due to the heat wave. The manager producer of the natural gas decided that in the case of a shortage in natural gas he will allocate gas to its customers under the following priorities:
According to Ben Elliot AgriChem Corporation’s uses were in the second and third priority.
Therefore Enerco decided to enforce “rolling browouts” which is temporary and periodic curtailment of natural gas supplies.
Now we need to study and analyze the information and decide which complex should the company produces that will be less affected by a natural gas curtailment and decide what production level the company should use to maximize the profit of the company.
Discussion and Results
First of all we will identify the X's of the products:
Let:
X1: The amount of Ammonia produced
X2: The amount of Ammonium Phosphate produced
X3: The amount of Ammonium Nitrate produced
X4: The amount of Urea produced
X5: The amount of Hydrofluoric acid produced
X6: The amount of Chlorine produced
X7: The amount of Caustic soda produced
X8: The amount of Vinyl chloride monomer produced
The table below will show the contribution of the profit and overhead for each product which will help us in concluding the objective function.
TABLE 1 Contribution to profit and overhead 

Product 
$/Ton 
Ammonia 
80 
Ammonium phosphate 
120 
Ammonium nitrate 
140 
Urea 
140 
Hydrofluoric acid 
90 
Chlorine 
70 
Caustic soda 
60 
Vinyl chloride monomer 
90 
For 20% natural gas curtailment:
Objective Function will be:
Maximize profit 80 +120 +140 +140 +90 +70 +60 +90
Before writing the constraints, we should take the percentage or capacity under consideration, as the table below shows the percentage % of the capacity of each product.
TABLE 2 Operational data 

Product 
Capacity (tons/day) 
Production Rate (% of capacity 
Natural Gas Consumption 
(1,000 cu. ft./ton) 

Ammonia 
1,500 
80 
8.0 
Ammonium phosphate 
600 
90 
10.0 
Ammonium nitrate 
700 
70 
12.0 
Urea 
200 
80 
12.0 
Hydrofluoric acid 
800 
70 
7.0 
Chlorine 
1,500 
80 
18.0 
Caustic soda 
1,600 
80 
20.0 
Vinyl chloride monomer 
1,400 
60 
14.0 
Calculations for of the Capacity:
Constraints:
The figures below show the results by using QM. First, we chose linear program then we chose 9 constraints and 8 variables, then we inserted the data into the table from QM.
Calculations for 20% natural gas curtailment:
Figure (1): Inserting the data in QM table.
Results for 20% natural gas curtailment:
After inserting the data, we pressed the Solve button to solve the linear program problem; the figure below shows the result of the case study.
Figure (2): The result in QM.
The optimal solution is :
We can see that the Caustic soda production is reduced from 1200 to 423.2 tons/day.
For 40% natural gas curtailment:
Objective Function will be:
Maximize profit 80 +120 +140 +140 +90 +70 +60 +90
Current natural gas usage = 85,680 cu. ft. *103/day.
40 percent curtailment = 51,408 cu. ft. * 103/day.
Constraints:
Calculations for 40% natural gas curtailment:
Figure (3): Inserting the data in QM table.
Results for 40% natural gas curtailment:
After inserting the data, we pressed the Solve button to solve the linear program problem; the figure below shows the result of the case study.
Figure (4): The result from QM.
The optimal solution is :
After solving the case study with linear program problem and QM software, we can now answer the question: "Which of AgriChem’s complexes would be least affected by a gas curtailment?"
It shows that the Caustic soda would be products that is affected by the gas curtailment. Since its production is zero. And the chlorine production is reduced from 1200 to 718.22 tons/day.
Conclusion
After reading and studying the case study, we analyzed the information and constructed the objective function and the constraints. The objective of the case study was maximize profit and by using QM software, we found the solution of the problem; the least product that is affected by gas curtailment, which is Caustic soda. By solving this case study we got many benefits, we learned how to convert the information in a case study to a linear problem. In addition, we learned how to use the QM software to find the solution of the problem, actually, QM software was very helpful, and it makes it very easy to find the solution rather than solving it manually.
LINEAR PROGRAMMING MODELS: GRAPHICAL AND COMPUTER METHODS
Internet Case Study: Agri Chem Corporation
This case demonstrates an interesting use of LP in a production setting. Let X_{1} = tons of ammonia to produce, X_{2} = tons of ammonium phosphate to produce, X_{3} = tons of ammonium nitrate to produce, X_{4} = tons of urea to produce, X_{5} = tons of hydrofluoric acid to produce, X_{6} = tons of chlorine to produce, X_{7} = tons of caustic soda to produce, and X_{8} = tons of vinyl chloride monomer to produce.
Objective function: Maximize profit = 80X_{1} + 120X_{2} + 140X_{3} + 140X_{4} + 90X_{5} + 70X_{6} + 60X_{7} + 90X_{8}
Subject to:
X_{1} ≤ 1,200 (= 80% of 1,500) X_{2} ≤ 540 X_{3} ≤ 490
X_{4} ≤ 160 X_{5} ≤ 560 X_{6} ≤ 1,200
X_{7} ≤ 1,280 X_{8} ≤ 840 All variables ≥ 0
The current natural gas usage is 85,680,000 cu. ft. per day (= 1,200 × 8 + 540 × 10 + 490 × 12 + …).
A 20% curtailment implies availability is 0.8 × 85,680 = 68,554,000 cu. ft. per day. Hence, the gas constraint is: 8X_{1} + 10X_{2} + 12X_{3} + 12X_{4} + 7X_{5} + 18X_{6} + 20X_{7} + 14X_{7} ≤ 68,544
The solution is shown in file Ch02Internet Case Agri Chem.XLS, sheet 20%. The production schedule (tons/day) is:
Ammonia 
Amm. Phosphate 
Amm. Nitrate 
Urea 
Hydro Acid 
Chlorine 
Caustic Soda 
Vinyl Chloride 

Tons/Day 
1,200.0 
540.0 
490.0 
160.0 
560.0 
1,200.0 
423.2 
840.0 

Profit 
$80 
$120 
$140 
$140 
$90 
$70 
$60 
$90 
$487,192.00 
Because of the natural gas curtailment, the caustic soda production is reduced from 1,280 tons/day to only 423.2 tons/day.
A 40% curtailment implies availability is 0.6 × 85,680 = 51,408,000 cu. ft. per day. Hence, the gas constraint is: 8X_{1} + 10X_{2} + 12X_{3} + 12X_{4} + 7X_{5} + 18X_{6} + 20X_{7} + 14X_{7} ≤ 51,408
The solution is shown in file Ch02Internet Case Agri Chem.XLS, sheet 40%. The production schedule (tons/day) is:
Ammonia 
Amm Phosphate 
Amm Nitrate 
Urea 
Hydro Acid 
Chlorine 
Caustic Soda 
Vinyl Chloride 

Tons/Day 
1,200.00 
540.00 
490.00 
160.00 
560.00 
718.22 
0.00 
840.00 

Profit 
$80 
$120 
$140 
$140 
$90 
$70 
$60 
$90 
$428,075.56 
Because of the natural gas curtailment, the caustic soda production is eliminated completely and the chlorine production is reduced from 1,200 to 718.2 tons/day.
Follow Us