LIDA100 : Annotated Bibliography : Normalcy Returns Compared to Paren

⭳ 72 Download 📄 7 Pages / 1513 Words

Part 1

Read your chosen source carefully.

Take notes as you read, highlight important parts, and re-read sections that are especially important or challenging. Become familiar with each author’s point of view, and the ideas upon which the author is building an argument. As you read, consider:

What ideas does the author represent or support? How/why?
Who does the author contend or disagree with? How/why?
Most importantly, what ideas are discussed in the source that you could apply to your own research?

Part 2

Create a Work Cited entry for your source (in an annotated bib., these go at the top of the page instead of the bottom before you write about each source). Figure out what kind of source it is, and then use OWL MLA to help you cite it.

Part 3

Compose an annotated entry for your source in paragraph form.

First give some background information on your source:

What kind of source is it?
Where is it from (publication)?
When was it published?
Who is the author and what information does the text provide about them?

2.Then sum up the source’s key ideas in your own words and describe the author’s positions as they relate to your topic (refer to the notes you took in Part 1 above).

*Use authorial action! That is, focus on the action of the author and their arguments (e.g., “Dr. Jones argues” instead of “This article argues”).

Part 4

In at least one full paragraph for EACH new entry, make connections between some of your sources in your analysis of them (this can include sources from your previous annotated bibliographies).

How are their arguments or perspectives similar or different?
How might you begin to position or connect them?
How might you use one source to question other(s)?

Answer:

1. Reading

In the first article, Fry, Igielnik, and Patten try to answer the question regarding “How today Millennials compare with their grandparents 50 years ago.” To answer the question appropriately, the three authors identify a number of reasons. First and foremost, they have identified that within the five decades that have passed, Millennials unlike the aged are more detached from institutions like religion, political parties, marriage, and the military. It is also true that young adults of today are better educated compared to the Silent Generation. Again, most of the Millennial women are well educated (most have bachelor’s degrees) compared to their male counterparts. For the Silent Generation, the reverse is true. However, today’s young women are likely to be having jobs unlike those in the Silent Generation within their years as young adults. The authors also agree towards the fact that today’s youth are more likely not to get married compared to the Silent Generation when they were youth. Also, unlike the Silent Generation members, the current youth are minorities of race and ethnicity. The men in the Silent Generation were far more veterans compared to today’s men. Yet again, most of today’s Millennials live in metropolitan areas compared to the Silent Generation in their youth.

For the second article, a prolific writer known as Derek Thompson tries to answer the question: “Are Today's Youth Really a Lost Generation?” According to his findings, the current generation is regarded as lost. To support his finding, he argues that most young people can’t find jobs, houses, or leave their parents’ homes. Also, he states that the Millennials face the Great Recession’s great irony. His major discoveries are based on two evaluations made. First, he establishes that there are two crises in the current society. Secondly, he names them as the greater recession and The Great Recession. While The Great Recession stands a chance of ending, the greater recession won't.

2.Work Cited Entry

We have two articles;

Thompson, Derek. “Are Today's Youth Really a Lost Generation?” Business. (22 Sep. 2011): n.pag. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/09/are-todays-youth-really-a-lost-generation/245524/ .16 June 2018.

Richard, Fry. Ruth, Igielnik and Eileen, Patten. “How Millennials today compare with their grandparents 50 years ago.” Factank. (2009): n.pag. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/16/how-millennials-compare-with-their-grandparents/ . 16 June 2018

3.Annotated Bibliography Entry

This is an online generated article written by Thompson Derek and called “Are Today's Youth Really a Lost Generation?” Written on the 22^nd of September 2011, the main idea is about the current state of the existing youth. Herein, it is identified that the current youth belongs to the "Lost Generation." This article is published under a platform called Business Inc. A number of reasons are provided in the article to support the reason behind Derek’s argument. First and foremost, the youth is struggling to begin their own families or even start families. According to Derek, the cause of every problem that young people face is the Great Recession. However, the arguments are based on provable research outcomes. One of such outcomes is that the percentage of young adults living with their parents has increase by about 25% (which is approximately 6 million) within a three year span. The article then creates concerns regarding Millenials facing issues when normalcy returns compared to parents as well as older peers.

Three authors (Fry, Igielnik, and Patten) work together in an educative online article called “How Millennials today compare with their grandparents 50 years ago” to compare and contrast Millenianls to The Silent Generation youth. The article was published in 2009 by Factank. The main argument is that the two youth generations have a significant amount of differences. To prove the arguments, the three authors demonstrate how within five decades that has passed; Millennials (unlike the aged) are more detached from institutions like religion, political parties, marriage, and the military.

From the two article provided for analysis, it is clear that young adults of today are better educated compared to the Silent Generation while most of the Millennial women are well educated (most have bachelor’s degrees) compared to their male counterparts with the reverse being true for the Silent Generation. Also, today’s young women are likely to be having jobs unlike those in the Silent Generation within their years as young adults. The youth of today are more likely not to get married compared to the Silent Generation when they were youth. Again, unlike the Silent Generation members, the current youth are minorities of race and ethnicity. The men in the Silent Generation were far more veterans compared to today’s men, and lastly, most of today’s Millennials live in metropolitan areas compared to the Silent Generation in their youth.

4.Connections Between Sources

The two articles have the same idea. They are written to drive in the same notion of changes among the lives of the youth through generations. These online sources expound on issues faced by the Millenials vis-a-vee those associated with the Silent generation. To draw close resemblance between the two works, it is important to outline the major discussion points in the two articles. First and foremost, Derek, in his article, purport that the current youth lives in a generation that is lost. However, Fry, Igielnik, and Patten’s article tries to argue out (in relation to Derek’s line of argument) that the Millenials, unlike the aged are more detached from institutions like religion, political parties, marriage, and the military (Fry, Igielnik & Patten, 2009). On the contrary, it is the belief of Derek that the cause of every problem that young people face is the Great Recession of which he uses provable research outcomes to cement the argument. For the purpose of drawing close resemblance, we identify a line of thought of Patten and the others when they purport that the youth of today are more likely not to get married compared to the Silent Generation when they were youth. The final verdict from the articles’ points is that earlier generation youths were not as exposed as the current ones. That made them less aggressive and more socially acceptable compared to the current Millenials. However, the current youth are minorities of race and ethnicity (Derek, 2011).

Reference:

Derek, T. (2011). Are Today's Youth Really a Lost Generation? Business. Retrieved .16 June 2018. At: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/09/are-todays-youth-really-a-lost-generation/245524/

Fry, R., Igielnik, R., & Patten, E. (2009). How Millennials today compare with their grandparents 50 years ago.” Factank. Retrieved .16 June 2018. At: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/16/how-millennials-compare-with-their-grandparents/

Not the Exact Question you were looking for ? Post your question for assignment help and get instant help on your homework and assignment questions from our experts