Nur09714 Learning Teaching And Assessment Answers

Outlines effectively and clearly what will be discussed in the assignment, including an outline of the content. Consider the context of mentorship in nursing. Please use your own practice area where the student is placed for the purpose of this essay.

Discuss the underachieving student and the role of the mentor, identifying key qualities of an effective mentor                                  

Identify learning style/s and their application to learning, teaching and assessment of your student          

Application of learning theories for example: andragogy/pedagogy, cognitive and behavioural             

The importance of the clinical learning environment

Assessment to promote learning in practice.                                              

Explore the literature related to under achieving students and the consequences of failing to fail the student.  

Identify the common behaviours of underachieving students

Explore the literature related to the role of mentor in clinical practice and the unique relationship with their mentee.

Discuss the range of learning styles and the ways in which learning styles can be identified. Ascertain why learning styles are key to learning, teaching and assessment.

Specify your mentees learning style and apply to your discussion and analysis.

Determine how knowledge and application of learning theories in your role as mentor can enhance student learning. Demonstrate how you would apply theory to mentorship.   

Explore the literature to consider how the clinical environment impacts on the student learning experience

Provide evidence of SWOT analysis and how you make use of this in practice.  This can relate to clinical learning environment.    

Answer:

Introduction

Mentorship is an establishment learning technique which is profitable to the mentee, mentor along with the recruiting organization as a source of conveying the implicit comprehension of the establishment. It is typically used and theorized differently in diverse fields, and by cause of it, starters are unified into current societies of exercise in the organization. However, mentorship in nursing is a distinct dedication that succeeded in institutional culture and reinforced mentoring cooperation (Kroll, 2015). It is regarded vital for formulating, holding along with appealing nursing facility affiliates and to sustain the exceptional education programs quality (Luna, 2018).

The discussion is about a second year that has gone for a five week placement to a healthcare facility for mentorship because he has been underachieving in his past placement. The ambience of discussion will be on mentorship in nursing and the methods in which the mentor can develop learning, assessment along with instructing approaches which will assist the student to attain a prosperous result. Furthermore, it reveals the learning expectations along with resources in the operation area to close the discussion with how the learning acquired can be used in future practice by the mentor.

Discuss the underachieving student and the role of the mentor, identifying key qualities of an effective mentor.

The underachieving student

Student underachievement can be described as the continuous decline to achieve up to sensible expectations which are built on the intrinsic learner abilities (Hall, 2017). These students generally do not have the self-confidence to challenge and finish tasks; they work hard towards an expected objective but lack perseverance, regard themselves as being substandard to their colleagues and cannot also design and organize activities (Hogan, 2018). Majorly, underachieving students feel immoderate agitation and are incompetent of managing their tension. They demonstrate their apprehension to their mentor via going to them regularly and displaying their concern.

Also, few underachieving students might attempt to point their existence through becoming the mischief in the group hence fulfilling for the absence of self-reliance. There are others who may be overlooked in the group by being invisible because they are shy to ask queries and since they do not create a disturbance the mentor forgets them as they are quietly left behind their colleagues (James, 2016). Finally, these students get discouraged and entirely give up. Underachievement students score high in achievement tests together with aptitude but they ignore class quizzes, and they might be lacking concentration because of several outside interests other than studies. However, they may have the capability to comprehend concepts orally but maybe not in a position to execute them overachievement or perfection.

The mentor has to associate his decision making procedure to the professional judgment by carefully observing the student's character together with speaking to him or her personally about his or her interests along with problems. Furthermore, there is a need to enhance emotional intelligence and self-awareness among nursing students since they are essential applied and speculative concepts which enable learners to persevere and perceive little tension hence improving education. Emotional intelligence is accountable for problem-focused coping, pragmatic effect on well-being together with evident nursing proficiency but has an adverse impact on the perceived stress. To embrace operational and dynamic approaches for controlling stress augmented feelings of restraint together with emotional ability are crucial for nursing students which elevates their comfort.   

The role of the mentor and the key qualities of an effective mentor

A mentor is responsible for encouraging, supporting, teaching and explaining together with supervision (MacLaren, 2018). For a mentor to help students to achieve he or she needs to believe in their potentials and therefore mentorship is an effective, learner-centered and seriously indicated operation. The mentors along with mentee share a reciprocal association for the contentment and career achievements of both (Yun, Baldi & Sorcinelli, 2016). However, for the mentoring association to be active, the mentee and mentor must share a relation of mutuality, exact expectations from each other, individual network, shared values and mutual respect (Ssemata, Gladding, John & Kiguli, 2017). However, the connection amidst the mentor and mentee fails in an instance where there is no dedication, real competition or mentor’s experience, communication and difference in interests and values (Barrett, Mazerolle & Nottingham, 2017).

Moreover, the mentor accesses the mentees’ analytical practice for registering. Consequently, several mentors are inconsistent and reluctant in doing so more so when evaluating unacceptable performance and time they find the assessments stressful, emotionally challenging and intimidating in some instances. Mentors may also lack enough evaluation tools or appropriate training for the same. The evaluation tools are sometimes imperfect in difficult proofs to discover talents or are unrealistic. Although particular devices could be generated for assistance degree evaluation of respect, sensitivity, dignity, and empathy demonstrated in the analytical setting is challenging to grade using these tools.

Therefore, mentors sometimes are obliged to pass insufficient students or having a commendation judgment directed by the institution. Mentors decline to fail learners as they are indecisive about their responsibility and presume that flunking low achievement is not part of their duty. Therefore, this has averted the assurance of only capable and harmless professionals gaining admissions to register for practice placing.

Identify learning style/s and their application to learning, teaching, and assessment of your student.

Learning is not a change in character but an alteration in the thinking procedure, feeling, and understanding of a student. There are three categories in which students can be classified which include tactile or kinesthetic learners, visual learners, and auditory learners. An evaluation has been conducted and found out that the learning style of an average student is 29 percent for visual, 37 percent for haptic and 34 percent for auditory learners (Yeom, Choi-Lundberg, Fluck & Sale, 2017). Auditory students are interested in verbal lecture, directives, and gestures; enjoy debates, pictures, and language.  They learn through talking aloud, listening and reading. Moreover, they grasp and recall sounds, and they are also good with words and language. Students who are active in auditory education spontaneously consume too much time while going through a passage and therefore a learner has to give written along with verbal specifications, use videos that enhance the written text, include complete group discussions, and allow them record lectures (Muniandy & Shuib, 2016).

Visual learners mostly study from visual demonstrations and desire in grasping the right notes, remember information via the manner in which it was placed on a page. These learners need to utilize presentations, charts, signs, pictures, displays, highlighting, diagrams, video recordings, images, flowcharts, marking and placards. On the other hand, kinesthetic or tactile learners learn through action, movement, and demonstration via touching (Khansari-Zadeh & Khatib, 2017). These students mostly learn via hands-on practice, enjoy acting, chew gum or snack whenever they are studying, move around when listening or talking and use movement as memory help. When they are learning something new, they stand instead of sitting and they don’t grasp a lot of what is taught in a lesson, perform perfectly with acting and have a distasteful time relaxing and hearkening.

Furthermore, tactile learners experience inflated energy levels, perform well whenever they are diligently engaged, choose to do instead of listening and need to take regular learn breaks. They are experimenters at heart and when learning they like to study via active involvement such as letting them use their hands on studying as much as possible, allowing them to make models of what they are learning, use hand tools and procedure based along with teaching them by taking them on a field trip. Presently, there is an intensified prominence on the use of simulation in nursing training, and various situations are played in distinct simulation techniques (Shin, Park & Kim, 2015). Nursing students are highly content with the implementation of the situations according to their response irrespective of the education level of the students or the simulation methods being utilized.

Application of learning theories for example: andragogy/pedagogy, cognitive and behavioral.

The comprehension of learning theories assists the mentor to acknowledge people and respond to learning depended on learning history, present circumstances and distinctive attributes. In that case, they study differently and have distinct timing of readiness. However, this comprehension makes the mentor conscious to the feeling and needs of the trainee and avoids the use of same training technique for everybody. Thus, the mentor utilizes distinct methods for teaching, coordinates the teaching plan correctly and recommends the assertion of emotions (Wallace & Brooks, 2015). Diverse theories have been suggested to educate students which entail cognitive learning theory, pedagogy and andragogy learning theory, social behavior learning theory along with behavior learning theory.

Learning in cognitive learning theory is progressive (Taylor, 2017). Cognitive developments and undertakings like psychological demonstrations, expectations, forecasts, and handling of information are critical for the cognitive understanding of knowledge. On the other hand, in social behavior learning theory, the behavior is cultured by recognizing others and modeling (Abd Wahid, Zulkifli & Suhairom, 2017). Learning happens through closely seeing the conduct of other individuals and its repercussions for them. The student need not have direct encounter but be alert and perceive the role model with high ability, to maintain and store whatever was perceived and accurately emulate the behavior that the model has displayed. Furthermore, inspiration is essential so that the students can show what they have studied (Abd Wahid, Zulkifli & Suhairom, 2017). Corrective feedback regarding penance and strengthening is required to add value and meaning to the behavior studied.

Whenever a process is studied it is hard to disremember and hence one must attempt to undertake and master to execute things appropriately initially and correct a mistake once it occurs before it turns to a dangerous job operation. Modeling retaliations along with anticipations have to be executed as collective work and in retaining the quality of occupation to be high opportunities to perceive knowledgeable in operation have to be given to the student. Learning in behavior learning theory entails support of a reaction via punishment or reward which was a simple feedback system. In analytical practice, reiteration and practice facilitate learning; support helps learning, activity aids learning and breaking down the entire procedure into smaller steps also helps to learn.

The pedagogy learning theory upholds the customary technique of training toddlers and reckoning the whole liability on trainers (Woods-McConney, 2015). This learning theory adheres to the content focus, teacher-centered learning and the concepts of rote learning. Here, the mentor describes what to be studied that is content, how it will be discovered that is a strategy when it will be studied that is timing and if it has been discovered that is an assessment. On the other hand, Andragogy learning theory recommends self-direct learning in adults. It is a learner's focused, problem-oriented, experienced-based and collective technique (Conradie, 2014).

 The Andragogy theory depend on Knowles’ presumptions of grown-up studying that upholds relevance of the necessity for adult students to recognize the prerequisite to study a thing before literally studying it and must be liable for their alternatives and to be contemplated expert for self-direction (Knowles, Holton III & Swanson, 2014). This type of theory is helpful in instituting a learning environment consisting of autonomy of expression, consideration of experience, natural ease, and mutual reliance and respect. Students ascertain objectives of learning to be their aims; they take charge for planning and evaluating their learning and are active learners who are dedicated.

 In the circumstances of learning, the diverse theories find their application based on their learning phase of the learner. In that case, a novice is more likely to study by following the rule-oriented character which is the behavior learning theory (Kruglanski & Gigerenzer, 2018). An advanced starter is more likely to see others and model that is social behavior learning theory. On the other hand, a proficient, competent, and adept stage student learn by common sense, comprehend using an understanding of the situation, recognizing patterns and concentrate on the real point of the matter without wasting unneeded time in problem-solving that is cognitive learning theory. Similarly, the andragogy and pedagogy learning theories are relevant by ascertaining the phase of the student (Todd, Ravi, Akoh & Gray, 2017)

The importance of the clinical learning environment

 To be a practice focused specialty the skills along with perception required in nursing are acquired from training in the clinical area and from formal education in institutions which contains the clinical learning environment (Dobrowolska et al., 2015). Clinical learning environment constitutes all things that surround nursing student including the mentor, equipment, clinical background, patients and instruments (Papastavrou, Dimitriadou, Tsangari & Andreou, 2016). A positive clinical learning environment enhances a positive learning outcome. Therefore, a productive learning atmosphere is shaped by encouraging student coordination, the stability of clinical placement, instructional surroundings, a good relationship between nursing care and a perceptible impact of affirmative interpersonal interconnections.

A positive clinical learning environment refers to the place where learning and teaching can take place most efficiently and fruitfully (d'Souza, Karkada, Parahoo & Venkatesaperumal, 2015). Also, it can be defined as a pleasurable and safe learning environment which involves the learner and fosters learning. Learners are in a position to learn in a benevolent way, and link theory to practice and this elevates the proficiency of the learners and facilitates learning hence assisting the learner in growing and developing. In a positive learning environment, the mentor has a role in motivating, being a good role model, encouraging and also being approachable (Vinales, 2015). Furthermore, the mentor should be in a position to generate learning opportunities to take place by choosing correct points from easy to complicated work.

  There must be efficient open communication and therefore during the introduction of students the mentor should introduce the clinical team and doctors, lay out the anticipations clearly, plan the objectives and make the student feel welcomed. Also, the mentor must create a bond with the learner via guidance, good relationships, and support and utilizes the quickly accessible resources such as training room, procedure manual, workforce and manikins. The mentor should adequately analyze the knowledge, attitude, and skills (KAS) of the student (Williamson, Almaskari, Lester & Maguire, 2015). Consequently, the most common causes of anxiety among nurses include loss of job, looking stupid, fear of failure, loss of face and having to change. Therefore, to get rid of this agitation teaching technique in the clinical environment have to utilize structured directive, commence instruction with known topics, and break the studying period into short and quickly controlled steps. The mentor should give guidance in a warm and embracing way, offer plenty of opportunity to practice, use positive support by encouraging and praising every achievement, let the mentee know the part he or she performs correctly as often as possible, never leave the student alone for an extended period and never compare the student with another individual (McKinsey, 2016).

To help the mentor in evaluating the learning environment of the work area, the Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat analysis can be utilized. This SWOT analysis can be placed in exemplary like,

Strengths: The learning environment is friendly to the mentee and permits refuge in case the student is quickly disturbed by auditory or visual cues, cohesive team that works well and together and mentor has extensive experience in coaching.

Weaknesses: Lack of experience of mentee can lead to loss of time when handling high priority matters and incumbent emergency cases could lead to the student being left alone as peril evaluation could not be done on time.

Opportunities: Team is capable of gaining additional knowledge in building up a rapport with new members if only placement and room for enhancement on working as a staff by comprehension and observation.

Threats: Mentee might communicate and lead to exchange of lousy details amidst staffs on medical issues, and the mentee may not be able to manage stress when under pressure.

At the start of the interview, the development in comprehension the student needs to be conducted well where the mentee and the mentor come into contact. An interview allows a mentee to perceive the goal of the placement and therefore a SMART conversation can be utilized to help the mentor for the original meeting. A SMART evaluation is done and organized with Specifics, Measurements, Assignment, Realism and Time (David & CluttErBuCk, 2016). The mentor has to comprehend the issue of the underachieving student in the last placement and identify the parts that are needed for advancement and the mentor will also propose a measure of improvement. During the deployment, the mentor will allocate the duties along with the responsibilities of the student and attain the optimum outcomes the objectives set by the mentor has to be genuine, and a timeline for the said accomplishments can be communicated to the student as a guided reference. Lying of goals and concentrating on the parts required for enhancement should be determined in the original steps since it would be the foundation for the mentor as to how they would design the development of students (David & CluttErBuCk, 2016)

Assessment to promote learning in practice

Evaluation will be required to acquire information on which educational decisions will be based. The appraisal will incorporate the collection, measurement, and interpretation of data associated with the response of students to the instruction process. Also, it is a measure of the progress and competence of mentee (Johnson & Gandhi, 2015). The mentor needs to maintain proper records to keep track of the mentee's growth. Furthermore, frequent meetings between the mentor and mentee are vital for evaluating the improvement. Self-assessments by the student must also be endorsed because it is an efficient and effective tool needed to determine weaknesses along with strengths and the student should initiate an awareness of his weaknesses, strengths together with the standard of practice (Machado, 2018).

Both the formative and summative evaluations need to be regarded, and the assessments must be valid, logical and reliable (Broadbent, Panadero & Boud, 2018). Consequently, feedback is an integral area of training and education programs and requires being two ways that are by the mentee for the mentor and by the mentor for the mentee (Brody et al., 2016). Moreover, the feedbacks must be taken from caregivers, inter-professional staff, peers, relatives, and service users or patients. The feedback procedure must be written and verbal, and there should be correct and rigorous notation of evaluation.

Conclusion

The lesson gained is that it is essential to evaluate the learning style of the student before planning on how to deal with the underachievement. Also, understanding of learning theories is highly helpful in the procedure, and the clinical working environment and staff support play a substantial role. However, the mentee needs to be made completely aware and conscious of their incompetence, and in case the skill awareness and deficiency are non-existent or low they will not see the need for learning that is, unconscious incompetence. Therefore, it is vital to institute weakness attention before imparting mentorship to move to the preceding stage that is, conscious incompetence or learning.

References

Abd Wahid, N. H., Zulkifli, N. M., & Suhairom, N. (2017). Theories and learning styles on workplace learning: a literature review. Journal of research in technical and vocational education (jrtve), 1(1).

Barrett, J. L., Mazerolle, S. M., & Nottingham, S. L. (2017). Attributes of effective mentoring relationships for novice faculty members: perspectives of mentors and mentees. Athletic Training Education Journal, 12(2), 152-162.

Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., & Boud, D. (2018). Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: a case study in a large class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 307-322.

Brody, A. A., Edelman, L., Siegel, E. O., Foster, V., Bailey Jr, D. E., Bryant, A. L., & Bond, S. M. (2016). Evaluation of a peer mentoring program for early career gerontological nursing faculty and its potential for application to other fields in nursing and health sciences. Nursing outlook, 64(4), 332-338.

Conradie, P. W. (2014). Supporting self-directed learning by connectivism and personal learning environments. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(3), 254.

David, S. A., & CluttErBuCk, D. (2016). Goals in Coaching and Mentoring: The Current State of Play. In Beyond Goals (pp. 53-68). Routledge.

Dobrowolska, B., McGonagle, I., Jackson, C., Kane, R., Cabrera, E., Cooney?Miner, D., ... & Kekuš, D. (2015). Clinical practice models in nursing education: implication for students' mobility. International nursing review, 62(1), 36-46.

d'Souza, M. S., Karkada, S. N., Parahoo, K., & Venkatesaperumal, R. (2015). Perception of and satisfaction with the clinical learning environment among nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 35(6), 833-840.

Hall, T. A. (2017). A case study about the implied and perceived messages sent by one teacher through instruction for academic and behavioral expectations of students(Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California).

Hogan, J. (2018). An Examination of Innovative Pedagogical Practices for Turning Around or Enhancing Student Persistence Rates (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University).

James, T. (2016). Discovering the Hidden Gems: A Study of the Underrepresentation of Black and Latino/a Students in Gifted and Talented Education (Doctoral dissertation).

Johnson, M. O., & Gandhi, M. (2015). A mentor training program improves mentoring competency for researchers working with early-career investigators from underrepresented backgrounds. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(3), 683-689.

Khansari-Zadeh, S. M., & Khatib, O. (2017). Learning potential functions from human demonstrations with encapsulated dynamic and compliant behaviors. Autonomous Robots, 41(1), 45-69.

Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). Andragogy in practice: expanding the usefulness of the andragogical model. In The Adult Learner (pp. 86-108). Routledge.

Kroll, J. R. (2015). Exploring effective peer group mentoring: A qualitative narrative study of executive-level professional women (Doctoral dissertation, Fielding Graduate University).

Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2018). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. In The Motivated Mind (pp. 112-136). Routledge.

Luna, G. (2018). Making Visible Our Invisible Faculty: Mentoring for Contingent Online Faculty. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 18(2).

Machado, C. (2018). Training and Development of Human Resources: A Brief Contribution to a Better Understanding of Its Relevance. In Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management (pp. 173-203). Springer, Cham.

MacLaren, J. A. (2018). Supporting nurse mentor development: An exploration of developmental constellations in nursing mentorship practice. Nurse education in practice, 28, 66-75.

McKinsey, E. (2016). Faculty Mentoring Undergraduates: The Nature, Development, and Benefits of Mentoring Relationships. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(1), n1.

Muniandy, J., & Shuib, M. (2016). Learning styles, language learning strategies and fields of study among ESL learners. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 12(1).

Papastavrou, E., Dimitriadou, M., Tsangari, H., & Andreou, C. (2016). Nursing students’ satisfaction of the clinical learning environment: a research study. BMC nursing, 15(1), 44.

Shin, S., Park, J. H., & Kim, J. H. (2015). Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis. Nurse education today, 35(1), 176-182.

Ssemata, A. S., Gladding, S., John, C. C., & Kiguli, S. (2017). Developing mentorship in a resource-limited context: a qualitative research study of the experiences and perceptions of the makerere university student and faculty mentorship programme. BMC medical education, 17(1), 123.

Taylor, E. W. (2017). Transformative learning theory. In Transformative Learning Meets Bildung (pp. 17-29). SensePublishers, Rotterdam.

Todd, C. L., Ravi, K., Akoh, H. A., & Gray, V. (2017). Engaging Adult Learners Online Through Technology, Andragogy, and Flexible Course Design: From Theory to Practice. In Handbook of Research on Technology-Centric Strategies for Higher Education Administration (pp. 1-16). IGI Global.

Vinales, J. J. (2015). The mentor as a role model and the importance of belongingness. British journal of nursing, 24(10), 532-535.

Wallace, C. S., & Brooks, L. (2015). Learning to teach elementary science in an experiential, informal context: culture, learning, and identity. Science Education, 99(1), 174-198.

Williamson, K. M., Almaskari, M., Lester, Z., & Maguire, D. (2015). Utilization of evidence-based practice knowledge, attitude, and skill of clinical nurses in the planning of professional development programming. Journal for nurses in professional development, 31(2), 73-80.

Woods-McConney, A. (2015). Teacher Preparation and Indigenous Students. Encyclopedia of Science Education, 1025-1027.

Yeom, S., Choi-Lundberg, D. L., Fluck, A. E., & Sale, A. (2017). Factors influencing undergraduate students’ acceptance of a haptic interface for learning gross anatomy. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(1), 50-66.

Yun, J. H., Baldi, B., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2016). Mutual mentoring for early-career and underrepresented faculty: Model, research, and practice. Innovative Higher Education, 41(5), 441-451.