Scwk90056 Program Planning : Disease Assessment Answers

Answer:

Ways of developing evaluation plan for strategic planning

The development of evaluation plan is done by considering the major standards of evaluation such as the feasibility, integrity, usability and propriety. To prepare a framework for program evaluation, it is important to engage the stakeholders, describe the program and lastly focus on the evaluation plan. At first, the context should be assessed for understanding the political environment of the organisation, determine the relationship between the evaluation plan components and assess the evaluation level at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (Issel & Wells 2017). The requirements must be gathered, and involvement of stakeholders is needed for defining the clear roles and responsibilities during the group process. The program theory is understood, and evaluation process is focused on by assessing the feasibility of the plan too.

Elements of strategic plan in balanced scorecard

The balanced scorecard is an effective strategic planning process, which allows communicating the things that are needed to be achieved, align the everyday activities of CDC with the strategy, focus more on the projects, products and services and monitor the progress towards the strategic targets. The context is assessed by gaining a thorough understanding of the environment within which, the organization's evaluation plan is prepared (Lichfield, Kettle & Whitbread 2016). Collecting the requirements can help to identify the major stakeholders and develop structures to enhance the process of involving stakeholders. The stakeholders are involved by facilitating communication between each other while the domain is established for finally creating an evaluation plan (McKenzie, Neiger & Thackeray 2016).

Outlining initial timeline for evaluation

The initial timeline is prepared for determining the various steps in the planning process and the issues associated with those. To evaluate planning for evaluation, CDC must identify the various steps such as assessing the organisation’s context, collect the requirements, involve the stakeholders, describe the actual program that should be evaluated and prioritise on the process of evaluation (Ricklin 2012).

Timeline

Strategies to influence refreezing

The refreezing stage is an integral step of Lewin’s model of a change process. It is seen that CDC has enabled changes for improving public health and workers have adopted the new ways of performing tasks too. The refreezing is possible by helping people and internalising the changes and are needed to be incorporated into daily business activities too. The changes and the new sense of stability can further help in making people more confident and comfortable to work with CDC (Sylvia & Sylvia 2012). The Government funding has helped to make improvements in the infrastructure of organisation. The program development has helped in transforming from the initial stages on a smaller scale to the operating program stage during the continuous running and evaluation of the plan. Various time constraints are imposed on the evaluator for managing the evaluation plan properly within a very shorter time. The tobacco control initiatives have helped in putting more tax to tobacco items for increasing its prices and promote good health. It is a major political issue because, with the reduction in smoking habits, many farmers will face loss (Issel & Wells 2017). Thus, the tobacco control strategy could allow people to embrace the new changes and influence the refreezing furthermore.

Evaluating the planned changes in future

The changes that are needed to be planned in future include feasibility analysis correctly enable collection of data. The assessment of burden should be done by evaluating the rationale of research and eliminate the redundancies for developing a good evaluation plan. The hierarchy of questions is developed with the assessment of the need for program, design and management of theory, implementation of the program and maintains costs to deliver efficiency (Lichfield, Kettle & Whitbread 2016).  

References

Issel, L. M., & Wells, R. (2017). Health program planning and evaluation. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Lichfield, N., Kettle, P., & Whitbread, M. (2016). Evaluation in the Planning Process: The Urban and Regional Planning Series (Vol. 10). Elsevier.

McKenzie, J. F., Neiger, B. L., & Thackeray, R. (2016). Planning, implementing & evaluating health promotion programs: A primer. Pearson.

Ricklin, A. (2012). Healthy Planning: an evaluation of comprehensive and sustainability plans addressing public health. American Planning Association.

Sylvia, R. D., & Sylvia, K. M. (2012). Program planning and evaluation for the public manager. Waveland Press.