Urgenthomework logo
UrgentHomeWork
Live chat

Loading..

ACC341 New Taxation Law

Answering Q1

A well-designed answer that addresses the specific aspects of marking rubric will:

Introduction

  1. Include a copy of the news article.
  2. Identify, describe and discuss the key issues reported in the news article.
  3. Link the major issues to ACC341 topics and theories:
  4. i) Identify a range of relevant accounting theories that are applicable to the issues reported in the news article.
  5. ii) Deconstruct and evaluate the issues reported in the news article through the use of theories.

iii) Present a logical conclusion regarding the significance of the issues reported in the news article.

  1. Critically evaluate the underlying assumptions of the accounting theories, in particular, with regard to their application to the issues identified in the news article.

Conclusion

There is a lot of subject content contained within the above design, and the question has a tight word-count, so your answers will need to be concise. The following are directed links that form the core of the resources and readings necessary to answer Q1.

Introduction ≈65 words

Outline what your paper will be presentingInclude a copy of the news article 1 mark

Here is a link to the news article that we reviewed in class: 

Here is how to reference the news article:

Reference List

IASB publishes revised Conceptual Framework (2018, 29 March). Deloitte IAS Plus. Retrieved from

In-text

("IASB publishes Conceptual Framework", 2018)

  • Take a screen shot from the website and paste a copy of the article into your Word doc.
  • Format the image: crop, border.
  • Label the image: Figure 1: IASB publishes revised Conceptual Framework.
  • Reference the image: ("IASB publishes Conceptual Framework", 2018 )

Figure 1: IASB publishes revised Conceptual Framework ("IASB publishes Conceptual Framework", 2018)Here is the text for the news article that we reviewed in class:

IASB publishes revised Conceptual Framework

29 Mar 2018

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has published its revised 'Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting'. Included are revised definitions of an asset and a liability as well as new guidance on measurement and de-recognition, presentation and disclosure. The new Conceptual Framework does not constitute a substantial revision of the document as was originally intended when the project was first taken up in 2004. Instead the IASB focused on topics that were not yet covered or that showed obvious shortcomings that needed to be dealt with. 

Background

The Conceptual Framework had been left largely unchanged since its inception in 1989. In 2004, the IASB and the FASB decided to review and revise the conceptual framework, however, changed priorities and the slow progress in the project led to the project being abandoned in 2010 after only Phase A of the original joint project had been finalised and introduced into the existing framework as Chapters 1 and 3 in September 2010. Phase D saw the publication of a discussion paper and an exposure draft but was never finalised. The Boards discussed Phases B and C quite extensively without any consultation document ever being issued, and Phases E to H largely remained untouched. 

During the 2011 agenda consultation many participants called for the IASB to reactivate and finalise the conceptual framework project given the multitude of open conceptual issues it is facing in many of its current projects. As a result, the IASB officially added the project to its agenda again in September 2012, this time as an IASB-only project and no longer aimed at a substantial revision of the framework but focused on those topics that are not yet covered (e.g. presentation and disclosure) or that show obvious shortcomings that need to be dealt with. As a first step, a Discussion Paper covering all aspects of the framework project was published in July 2013, followed by a comprehensive Exposure Draft in May 2015.

Summary of main aspects of the Conceptual Framework

The 2018 Conceptual Framework is structured into an introductory explanation on the status and purpose of the Conceptual Framework, eight chapters, and a glossary:


>

Chapter

Topic

 

Status and purpose of the Conceptual Framework

1

The objective of general purpose financial reporting

2

Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information

3

Financial statements and the reporting entity

4

The elements of financial state­ments

5

Recognition and de-recognition

6

Measurement

7

Presentation and disclosure

8

Concepts of capital and capital maintenance

Appendix A

Glossary

The key content of each chapter is summarised below:

Status and purpose of the Conceptual Framework.

The first section notes that the Conceptual Framework's purpose is to assist the IASB in developing and revising IFRSs that are based on consistent concepts, to help preparers to develop consistent accounting policies for areas that are not covered by a standard or where there is choice of accounting policy, and to assist all parties to understand and interpret IFRS. It maintains that the framework does not override any specific IFRS. Should the IASB decide to issue a new or revised pronouncement that is in conflict with the framework, the IASB will highlight the fact and explain the reasons for the departure in the basis for conclusions?

Chapter 1 - The objective of general purpose financial reporting.

This is the first of the two chapters that were finalised as part of the joint project with the FASB in 2010, so there are only limited changes. The chapter notes that objective of general purpose financial reporting is to provide financial information about the reporting entity that is useful to existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors in making decisions relating to providing resources to the entity. This is identified as information about the entity’s economic resources and the claims against the reporting entity as well as information about the effects of transactions and other events that change a reporting entity’s economic resources and claims. The chapter newly stresses that information can also help users to assess management’s stewardship of the entity’s economic resources. 

Chapter 2 - Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information.

This is the second of the two chapters that were finalised as part of the joint project with the FASB in 2010 (published as Chapter 3 in the 2010 Conceptual Framework). Again, changes are limited. The chapter explains the fundamental qualitative characteristics (relevance and faithful representation) and the enhancing qualitative characteristics (comparability, verifiability, timeliness, and understandability) of useful financial information and notes the cost constraint. Materiality is noted as an entity-specific aspect of relevance. The chapter reintroduces an explicit reference to the notion of prudence and states that the exercise of prudence supports neutrality. Prudence is defined as the exercise of caution when making judgements under conditions of uncertainty. New is also a clarification that faithful representation means representation of the substance of an economic phenomenon instead of representation of its legal form only. 

Chapter 3 - Financial Statements and the reporting entity.

The chapter states the objective of financial statements (to provide information about an entity's assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses that is useful to financial statements users in assessing the prospects for future net cash inflows to the entity and in assessing management's stewardship of the entity's resources) and sets out the going concern assumption. It only mentions two statements explicitly: the statement of financial position and the statement(s) of financial performance (the latter being the former statement of comprehensive income); the rest are "other statements and notes".

The chapter notes that financial statements are prepared for a specified period of time and provide comparative information and under certain circumstances forward-looking information. New to the framework is the definition of a reporting entity and the boundary of it. The chapter also states the IASB's conviction that, generally, consolidated financial statements are more likely to provide useful information to users of financial statements than unconsolidated financial statements. 

Chapter 4 - The elements of financial statements.

The main focus of this chapter is on the definitions of assets, liabilities, and equity as well as income and expenses. The definitions are quoted below:

  • Asset: A present economic resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events. An economic resource is a right that has the potential to produce economic benefits.
  • Liability: A present obligation of the entity to transfer an economic resource as a result of past events.
  • Equity: The residual interest in the assets of the entity after deducting all its liabilities.
  • Increases in assets or decreases in liabilities that result in increases in equity, other than those relating to contributions from holders of equity claims.
  • Expenses: Decreases in assets or increases in liabilities that result in decreases in equity, other than those relating to distributions to holders of equity claims.

New is the introduction of a separate definition of an economic resource to move the references to future flows of economic benefits out of the definitions of an asset and a liability. The expression "economic resource" instead of simply "resource" stresses that the IASB no longer thinks of assets as physical objects but as sets of rights. The definitions of assets and liabilities also no longer refer to "expected" inflows or outflows. Instead, the definition of an economic resource refers to the potential of an asset/liability to produce/to require a transfer of economic benefits. Distinguishing between liabilities and equity is not part of the new framework but has been transferred to the IASB's research project on financial instruments with the characteristics of equity.

Chapter 5 - Recognition and de-recognition.

The Conceptual Framework states that only items that meet the definition of an asset, a liability or equity are recognised in the statement of financial position and only items that meet the definition of income or expenses are to be recognised in the statement(s) of financial performance. However, their recognition depends on two criteria: their recognition provides users of financial statements with (1) relevant information about the asset or the liability and about any income, expenses or changes in equity and (2) a faithful representation of the asset or the liability and of any income, expenses or changes in equity. The framework also notes a cost constraint. New to the framework is the discussion of de-recognition. The requirements as presented in the framework are driven by two aims: the assets and liabilities retained after the transaction or other event that led to de-recognition must be presented faithfully and the change in the entity's assets and liabilities as a result of that transaction or other event must also be presented faithfully. The framework also describes alternatives when it is not possible to achieve both aims. 

Chapter 6 - Measurement.

This chapter is dedicated to the description of different measurement bases (historical cost and current value (fair value, value in use/fulfilment value, and current cost)), the information that they provide and their advantages and disadvantages. Current cost is newly introduced into the Conceptual Framework as it is widely advocated in academic literature. A table offers an overview of the information provided by various measurement bases. The framework also sets out factors to consider when selecting a measurement basis (relevance, faithful representation, enhancing qualitative characteristics and the cost constraint, factors specific to initial measurement, as well as more than one measurement basis) and points out that consideration of the objective of financial reporting, the qualitative characteristics of useful financial information and the cost constraint are likely to result in the selection of different measurement bases for different assets, liabilities and items of income and expense.

The framework does not provide detailed guidance on when a particular measurement basis would be suitable because the suitability of particular measurement bases will vary depending on facts and circumstances. On equity, the framework offers some limited discussion, although total equity is not measured directly. Still, the framework maintains, it may be appropriate to measure directly individual classes of equity or components of equity to provide useful information. 

Chapter 7 - Presentation and disclosure.

In this chapter, the framework discusses concepts that determine what information is included in the financial statements and how that information should be presented and disclosed. The statement of statement of comprehensive income is newly described as "statement of financial performance", however, the framework does not specify whether this statement should consist of a single statement or two statements, it only requires that a total or subtotal for profit or loss must be provided. It also notes that the statement of profit or loss is the primary source of information about an entity’s financial performance for the reporting period and that only in "exceptional circumstances" the Board may decide that income or expenses are to be included in other comprehensive income. Notably, the framework does not define profit or loss, thus the question of what goes into profit or loss or into other comprehensive income is still unanswered. 

Chapter 8 - Concepts of capital and capital maintenance.

The content in this chapter was taken over from the existing Conceptual Framework and discusses concepts of capital (financial and physical), concepts of capital maintenance (again financial and physical) and the determination of profit as well as capital maintenance adjustments. The IASB decided that updating the discussion of capital and capital maintenance could have delayed the completion of the framework significantly. The Board might consider revising the description and discussion of capital maintenance in the future if it considers such a revision necessary. 

The Conceptual Framework does not have a stated effective date and the Board will start using it immediately.

The news article refers specifically to the IASB's publication of its revised Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.The IFRS presents information about the publication that is the subject of the news article in the ‘News and events’ section of the IFRS website.

Here is the link to the IFRS website:

Here is how to reference the IFRS website: 

In-text

("IASB completes revisions", 2018)

Here is the text from the 'News and events' section of the IFRS website:

IASB completes revisions to its Conceptual Framework9 March 2018

The International Accounting Standards Board (Board) has today issued a revised version of its Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting that underpins IFRS® Standards.

The Conceptual Framework sets out the fundamental concepts of financial reporting that guide the Board in developing IFRS Standards. It helps to ensure that the Standards are conceptually consistent and that similar transactions are treated the same way, providing useful information for investors and others.

The Conceptual Framework also assists companies in developing accounting policies when no IFRS Standard applies to a particular transaction; and it helps stakeholders more broadly to understand the Standards better.

The revised Conceptual Framework includes: a new chapter on measurement; guidance on reporting financial performance; improved definitions and guidance—in particular the definition of a liability; and clarifications in important areas, such as the roles of stewardship, prudence and measurement uncertainty in financial reporting.

Hans Hoogervorst, Chair of the Board, said:

The revised Conceptual Framework will greatly assist the Board when developing IFRS Standards. It will also help other stakeholders to better understand the concepts that underpin the Standards.

The Board will start using the revised Conceptual Framework immediately, whereas companies will use it from 2020.

The news article refers specifically to the IASB/IFRS's publication of its revised Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.

Here is the link to the IFRS website:

Here is how to reference the revised Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: 

The publication is included as a PDF: IFRS 2018a in the Assignment 2 folder in Student Resources 

  1. Identify, describe and discuss the key issues reported in the news article 2 marks

145 words

Tell the article’s story IN YOUR OWN WORDS clearly outlining the key issues:

  1. IASB has published its revised Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
    • Background: the project dates from 2004, and has involved an extensive multi-stage review utilising the deductive standard-setting process
  1. Summary of the main aspects of the Conceptual Framework
    • Status and purpose
    • Chapter 1 - The objective of general purpose financial reporting.
    • Chapter 2 - Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information.
    • Chapter 3 - Financial Statements and the reporting entity.
    • Chapter 4 - The elements of financial statements.
    • Chapter 5 - Recognition and de-recognition.
    • Chapter 6 - Measurement.
    • Chapter 7 - Presentation and disclosure.
    • Chapter 8 - Concepts of capital and capital maintenance.

The following outlines an effective method for answering this section:

  • First print the article, then read it through in its entirety, making notes as you identify the key issues. Use a highlighter to outline important sections, and write your thoughts in the margin as you go.
  • Next you need to describe these issues by paraphrasing the article.
    • To paraphrase is to include the ideas or information from an original source in your paper by rephrasing those ideas or information in your own words. The key to successful paraphrasing is to use as few words as possible from the original text (definitely no cut-and-paste/right click synonym), but be mindful not to change the meaning that you are trying to convey as you rephrase. Write with confidence as you extend your post-graduate English language skills...
  • Finally, discuss any identified arguments for/ against, advantages/disadvantages or strengths/weaknesses that become apparent as you describe the identified issues.
  1. Linkage of the major issues reported in the news article to topics and theories covered in ACC341 3 marks570 words

The Guidance for Section c. Linkage of the major issues... consists of three subsections: i), ii) and iii). This design helps you to clearly identify the different required aspects: the relevant accounting theories, linking the theories to the issues in the article, and drawing a conclusion about the linkage between the theories and the issues.Rather than structuring your answer as three distinct subsections, a quality response will integrate all three subsections into a seamless essay, using paragraphs to distinguish transitions in your thinking. The following outlines an effective method for answering this section: 

Use a variation of the basic D D E A method of answering an academic question...

  • Definition: Give a brief yet concise outline of the relevant accounting theory
  • Discussion: Link the accounting theory to the issue reported in the article in order to better analyse the issue. Remember, the function of a theory is to explain how things and events are connected, so use the theories to better explain the issues
  • Example: This is directly tied to the issue in the article
  • Answer the question: Explain the significance of the analysis by applying the theory to the issue and drawing a conclusion about the linkage 

The Marking Rubric indicates that essays which link the issues in the article to accounting theories will be well rewarded. As post-grad students, you should be able employ the D D E A method without using Definition, Discussion, Example & Answer as headings. Rather, D D E A is a functional philosophy that provides a structured way of thinking about your response to an academic assessment... A more appropriate style at this level is to use paragraphs to differentiate each D D E A element of your response. 

In summary, for each issue from the article, use the relevant theory to better explain the issue, and then draw a conclusion about the linkage. Remember: structure, consistency, attention to detail, so don't 'cut corners' when writing your response. This section of the essay presents you with an opportunity to demonstrate your awareness of the various accounting theories, and how this can be used to provide a deeper understanding of the issues in the article.i) Identify a range of relevant accounting theories that are applicable to the issues reported in the news article 

There a number of ACC341 topics that are applicable to the news article:

  • The nature, construction and verification of theories
    • The Conceptual Framework is normative in nature, the standard-setting process is deductive
  • The history of accounting
    • The Conceptual Framework was developed in consideration of the views of a wide range of stakeholders, hence new standards are socially-constructed
  • Measurement in accounting
    • The Conceptual Framework presents a full chapter on measurement
  • Normative accounting theories
    • The Conceptual Framework is the principal normative accounting theory
    • Other significant normative theories include Historical Cost Accounting and Fair Value Accounting
  • Accounting regulation and politics
    • While the Conceptual Framework development process may be deductive, it is primarily based on subjective observation and commentary, therefore it is prone to politicisation, and hence the theories of regulation apply
  • The standard-setting process
    • IASB is responsible for the development and publication of IFRS Standards
  • International accounting
    • Standardisation of accounting
    • IASB's principles-based standards 
  1. ii) Deconstruct and evaluate the issues reported in the news article through the use of theories 

The following guidance refers to the issues reported in the news article as outlined IN YOUR OWN WORDS in Section b. and Section c. i) ACC341 topics that contain the relevant theories.

  1. IASB has published its revised Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
    • Background: the project dates from 2004, and has involved an extensive multi-stage review utilising the deductive standard-setting process 

Over the past decade, the IFRS Foundation, acting for the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), has conducted an extensive multi-stage review of its Conceptual Framework 

  • The nature, construction and verification of theories
    • Deegan, 2104, pp.11-12: Prescriptive (normative) accounting theories 
  • The history of accounting
    • Matthews & Perera, 1996, pp.31-31: Accounting as a social phenomenon 
  • The standard-setting process
    • IFRS website: How we set IFRS Standards 
  • International accounting
    • Deegan, 2104, p.117: IASB objectives
    • IFRS website: Who we are

Here is how to reference Matthews & Perera:

Reference List

Mathews, M. R. & Perera, M. H. B. (1996). Theory construction in accounting. In Accounting theory and development, 3rd edn., Melbourne: Thomas Nelson. 

In-text

(Matthews & Perera, 1996, p.xxx) Note: replace xxx with the page numbers from the section(s) that you read

Here is how to reference Deegan:

Here is the link to the IFRS website: 

Here is how to reference the IFRS website: 

As you click on the different hyperlinks in the website, you will need to update each reference to reflect the new webpage…

It is also worth reviewing the IFRS archive website:

summary of the main aspects of the Conceptual Framework

    • Status and purpose
    • Chapter 1 - The objective of general purpose financial reporting.
    • Chapter 2 - Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information.
    • Chapter 3 - Financial Statements and the reporting entity.
    • Chapter 4 - The elements of financial statements.
    • Chapter 5 - Recognition and de-recognition.
    • Chapter 6 - Measurement.
    • Chapter 7 - Presentation and disclosure.
    • Chapter 8 - Concepts of capital and capital maintenance. 

The news article provides a concise review of each chapter contained in the Conceptual Framework. Given that your essay has a word count restriction, it may be necessary to limit your application of the theory to the issues to the most pertinent chapters. In this case, it would be prudent to state that your evaluation is limited to certain chapters...

As an example, the following guidance refers to a limited number of chapters only:

Status and purpose

  • International accounting
    • Deegan, 2014, 112-114: Standardisation
  1. 115-121: IASB

p.123: Principles-based accounting standards

  • Accounting regulation and politics
    • Deegan, 2014, 79-80: Public interest theory
    • IFRS website: How we work in the public interest 

Here is the link to the IFRS website: 

Here is how to reference the IFRS website:

Chapter 1- The objective of general purpose financial reporting

  • Normative accounting theories
    • Deegan, 2014, 214-218: Objectives of general purpose financial reporting

pp.228-231: Primary users 

Chapter 2- Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information

  • Normative accounting theories
    • Deegan, 2014, 234: Qualitative characteristics

pp.235-238: Fundamental qualitative characteristics

-Relevance + faithful representation

Chapter 6- Measurement

  • Measurement in accounting
    • Godfrey et al, 2010, pp.138-140: Types of measurement

pp.140-142: Reliability and accuracy

Here is how to reference Godfrey et al:

Reference List

Godfrey, J., Hodgson, A., Tarca, A., Hamilton, J., & Holmes, S. (2010). Measurement theory.

In Accounting Theory, 7th ed., Milton, Qld. : John Wiley. 

In-text

(Godfrey et al, 2010, p.xxx)

  • Normative accounting theories
    • Deegan, 2014, 234: Qualitative characteristics

pp.164-165: HCA

pp.169-174: Arguments against HCA

pp.194-196: HCA v FVA

iii) Present a logical conclusion regarding the significance of the issues reported in the news article 

Round off your linkage of the major issues reported in the news article to topics and theories covered in ACC341 with a logical conclusion. This is your opportunity to express your opinion based on the D D E A logic that you have just presented. Most importantly, it's your opinion, so write the conclusion entirely in your own words without any matching text.

Throughout all the above, there is scope for the very best submissions from those students seeking to differentiate their work, to include direct references to the IASB/IFRS's 2018 publication of its revised Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. 

  1. Critically evaluate the underlying assumptions of the accounting theories, in particular, with regard to their application to the issues identified in the news article 3 marks285 words

The following are some questions and/or statements that can guide your critical evaluation of the news article. Use this critical evaluation to provide her with a deeper theoretical understanding of the issues identified in the news article through your insights, in your own words.

  • Is the IFRS Conceptual Framework/standard-setting process effective?
    • The Conceptual Framework project has taken a long time to conclude. Why do you think this is so? Does the resultant report justify the time and expense 
  • Explain how the accounting theories help to provide a deeper understanding of the issues discussed in the news article.
    • Focus your thinking on the interdependent relationships between normative accounting theory, the standard-setting process, international accounting, and accounting regulation and politics. 
  • Comment on the revised Conceptual Framework:
    • Is the report valid?
    • What does the IFRS hope to achieve through the release?
    • Will the IFRS achieve these goals?
    • If the IFRS does achieve its goals, what will be the outcomes:

- for accounting?

Conclusion

Round off your paper IN YOUR OWN WORDS with a brief concluding statement.

Finally, include a Reference List at the end of your paper.

  • Use an APA referencing guide to ensure your Reference List utilises the correct format.
  • This includes listing references in alphabetical order.

Answer:

Introduction

In the article provided, it looks at what incorporation is and how it helps many actors save their money. With the new taxation law, many actors in New York City have to consider incorporation so that they can save their money. Accountants try and help actors as much as they can by providing guidance on what to do with their incomes.

  1. Issues presented in the article.

This article presents the following issues

With the new tax, law actors have been forced to incorporate to save their money. This is because in the new law they cannot make deductibles on the expenses that earned the income. Such costs include acting classes, buying scripts and attending voice lessons. Thus most actors find themselves spending a lot of their money to generate these jobs (Schaltegger & Burritt, 2017).

Many actors want to incorporate, but it also costs money. The startup fee is at most times $1000, and besides, there are other costs that an actor must pay (Seele & Gatti, 2017). Some of these costs are Medicare, bookkeeping and accounting expenses, social security and corporate taxes which sums up to $20000. Most actors cannot afford this because their income is $38000 (Kaya, 2017). 

Also once incorporated the actors can no longer get unemployment benefits once they are unemployed. Many actors did not like this and preferred having unemployment benefits when they were out of work. For others, the way to go is retirement plans, but they can hardly afford it (Smith, 2017).

  1. The theories that relate to these issues.
  2. The theories that relate to the issues in the article are positive accounting theory, agency theory, and the normative accounting theory.
  3. Positive accounting theory.

This theory is based on predictions. It states that an individual will try to predict and explain what will happen in a given situation (accounting practice). In this case is the issue of the actor thinking as of whether to incorporate or not. The actor will have to predict as to whether incorporating will save him money or not. After visiting the accountant's office for advice and looking at all the factors, an actor will have to predict whether incorporating will benefit them or not (de Villiers & Maroun, 2017).

A lot of explaining is also involved in this theory. For example, as the actor is making the prediction they will give a reasonable explanation as to why whatever they have predicted is the best solution for them. If they decide to incorporate, for example, they will explain how it will save their income and what the outcome will be after tax deduction.

Agency theory

The agency theory is based on the relationship between the agents and principal of business. This theory is solely based on these two relationships and tries to resolve any conflict that arises between them. At most times the conflict is due to diversity concerning goals and strategies. In this article, the principle is the actor while the agent is the accountant.

This theory can be applied to the article in the issue of the relationship between the accountant and the actor. Before incorporating, the actor has to consult with the accountant first so that they can get advice on what to do. Depending on the actor's salary the accountant will tell them to incorporate or not. The accountant in this case advices actors who earn $38000 not to incorporate. The actor may be adamant and still want to incorporate regardless of their salary. This will cause conflict between them (Shogren et al., 2017).

The agency theory tries to solve this conflict. The accountant may decide to conform to the needs of the actor so that they do not clash despite the wrong decision. On the other hand, they can choose to be firm and lay out arguments as to why the actor is making wrong choices.

Normative accounting theory

This theory states that one accounting system can be superior to another. In the theory, an individual chooses an accounting system that is most effective for their accounting practice. The theory also tries to explain why they choose the theory. This theory relates to the article in the issue when the actor wants to save their money and thus tries to come up with an accounting system that will achieve this goal.

The actor exploits some options with the accountant such as incorporating or beginning a retirement plan. For the incorporation, the actor must have a lucrative business while the retirement plan saves one $25000 in taxes. The actor will have to choose one of these two systems that will best lead to the achievement of their goals.

III. The significance of the issues

If individuals in the entertainment industry want to earn a living wage, then they should highly consider incorporating. For an actor like James Yagaeshi who has a family in New York and travels a lot, he finds himself having to pay for two households. This becomes so expensive and leaves a dent in his pocket. Therefore incorporating can be an excellent decision for him to save all the money he can.

  1. Assumptions of the theories

The positive accounting theory is not prescriptive. This theory explains what ought to happen rather than what should happen based on the explanations and predictions. For example, the actor tries to predict which action he will take to save money (Beams et al., 2017).

The predictions will be based on what ought to happen if they decide to incorporate. In this case, the outcome expected is for money to be saved. However, this may not be the case because it is not necessarily what will happen. The actor might end up not even saving any money because their income is too low (Silva et al., 2017).

The agency theory assumes that there are no risks involved in the relationship between the actor and the accountant. However, this is not always the case. For example, if James decides not to incorporate, then he faces the risk of being taxed a lot which leads to massive losses of his income. The risk applies to the principal and at most times are the ones that suffer at large (Trottier & Gordon, 2017).

Conclusion

Individuals in the entertainment industries need to consider incorporating. This is because most of their expenses, in the new tax law, such as acting classes and voice lessons are not deductible and this was the majority of their earnings.

Question 2

Exposure draft

The following exposure draft was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as a revision of the previous proposed standards update. The board issued the exposure draft for online commenting to help industries in several situations. Its primary aim was to help hosting arrangements know the accounting costs for implementation paid for by the customer. They also provided guidelines for determining whether an arrangement includes license software. If an arrangement is inclusive of software license, then the fees are paid for by the by the customer, and the software license is categorized as an intangible asset. Also, liability is recognized to the extent of the license. The company will account for the fees of implementation if the arrangement does not include a software license (Anderson et al., 2016).

In the previous proposed ASU there were no instructions on how to account for the costs of implementation, and therefore some entities requested it is included in the proposed amendments. The amendment thus addressed this by stating that all costs for implementation to be accounted for by the hosting arrangement (customer) in a contract. The amendments also included the guidelines for capitalizing the implementation costs in an arrangement and also the guidelines for the costs of developing and obtaining internal-use software. However, it only applies to companies that use the instructions in Subtopic 350-40 (Johnson, 2017).

The proposed ASU also gives guidelines on the necessary costs needed for implementation and the ones that are recognized as an intangible asset. In the amendments, the prices for capitalization of implementation will be accounted for by the customer for the duration of the contract. The FASB exposure draft also allows for the entities in a service contract to include disclosures for the implementation costs which they believe will allow for transparency between all that are involved in the arrangement (Hussey, 2017)

This exposure draft has been introduced to the interest of the public. First, they allow for entities to include disclosures for implementation costs. This benefits the customers because they will have all the information they require in a contract and thus promotes transparency. Second, it gives the customer guidelines on the accounting for implementation costs which is again of benefit to the customers in a hosting arrangement. Lastly, it allows licensing of the implementation costs that qualify as an asset which is of benefit to the customer. Therefore the draft puts the interest of the customers (public) first (Seyam & Brickman, 2016).

Comment letters

ONE

The views expressed in this comment letter are

Our institution is public, and we expect to contain more hosting arrangements in future. The proposed ASU can guide us on how to set up these arrangements and how to determine which are inclusive of a software license. We, therefore, support the Board's decision in allowing for the customer to account for the implementation costs.

Our institution supports the board decision in the customer covering the costs for implementation if it includes a software license and we are ready to put the changes to use.

By Virgin Society of CPA's

The views expressed in this comment letter are

Our institution is involved in the public sector with various collaborations. Therefore we agree with the proposed ASU to include disclosures in a service contract. We believe this will help our company in providing transparency.

Our institution agrees with the amendments in the capitalization of the implementation costs in a contract. We disagree with the amendment in allowing the customer to use the impairment model because we believe it will bring confusion (Watts & Zuo, 2016).

The letter is for the regulation in that they agree with the proposed ASU since it will benefit the company. The letter is also against the regulation because they disagree with the customer using the impairment model.

The views expressed in this letter are

Our company agrees with the proposed ASU on providing guidance for the accounting of implementation costs and also the evaluation of these costs that are incurred in a contract.

However, we believe that more changes need to be made to the amendments to include a broad scope of application and make it more flexible.

The letter is against the regulation in that they believe the amendments cannot be applied in a broad scope and more adjustments need to be made (Okamoto, 2017).

By International Business machines

The views expressed are

Our company supports the proposed ASU and believes that the guidelines given for the accounting of implementation costs are sufficient. We also agree that implementation costs should be capitalized and the arrangement is inclusive of a license for the duration of the contract. We do not agree about providing disclosures for implementation costs because it will not provide any necessary information (Biondi, 2011).

The letter is against the regulation because the institution believes that the disclosures are not necessary.

Theories of regulation

Public theory

The theory states that an agency sets regulations in a way that the public will benefit at large. This theory puts the interest of the public first. It is the most effective theory that applies to the comment letters. For instance, both the first and second comment letters agree with the amendments for disclosures because it will create transparency (Black, 2017).

Private theory

The theory states that regulations are set in a manner that the company itself will benefit at large. In this theory, the company puts its interest first so that its members can benefit. This theory is the least applied to the comment letters. For example, the fourth comment letter believes that the disclosures are not necessary because they do not want specific information to be in public.

Capture theory

The theory states that an agency that sets regulation for the public's benefit is captured by the industry and sets the regulations for the industry's benefit. None of the comment letters has applied this theory and is thus the least effective (Mitnick, 2015).

References

Anderson, U. L., Doxey, M. M., Geiger, M. A., Gist, W. E., Janvrin, D. J., & Polinski, P. W. (2016). Comments by the Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association on FASB Exposure Draft of Proposed Accounting Standard Update: Notes to Financial Statements (Topic 235): Assessing Whether Disclosures Are Material: Participating Committee Members. Current Issues in Auditing, 10(2), C1-C9.

Beams, F. A., Brozovsky, J. A., & Shoulders, C. D. (2017). Advanced accounting. Pearson.

Biondi, Y., Bloomfield, R. J., Glover, J. C., Jamal, K., Ohlson, J. A., Penman, S. H., ... & Wilks, T. J. (2011). A perspective on the joint IASB/FASB exposure draft on accounting for leases: American Accounting Association's Financial Accounting Standards Committee (AAA FASC). Accounting Horizons, 25(4), 861-871.

Black, J. (2017). Critical reflections on regulation. In Crime and Regulation (pp. 15-49). Routledge.

de Villiers, C., & Maroun, W. (2017). Introduction to sustainability accounting and integrated reporting. In Sustainability Accounting and Integrated Reporting (pp. 13-24). Routledge.

Evans, S., & Tourish, D. (2017). Agency theory and performance appraisal: How bad theory damages learning and contributes to bad management practice. Management Learning, 48(3), 271-291.

Hussey, R. (2017, May). Leasing of Assets: A Content Analysis of Comment. In GAI International Academic Conferences Proceedings (p. 23).

Johnson, C. H. (2017). FASB and Guarantees of Variable Interest Entities.

Kaya, ?. (2017). Accounting Choices in Corporate Financial Reporting: A Literature Review of Positive Accounting Theory. In Accounting and Corporate Reporting-Today and Tomorrow. InTech.

Mitnick, B. M. (2015). Capturing" Capture": Developing a Normative Theory of Fiducial Regulation.

Okamoto, N. (2017). Norm entrepreneur lobbying and persuasion: A case study involving the IASB's modification of an exposure draft. Research in Accounting Regulation, 29(2), 129-138.

Price, J. (2017). Potential introduction of corporate whistleblowing bounties: What are the implications? (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Brunswick, Canada).

Ramsay, I., & Webster, M. (2017). ASIC Enforcement Outcomes: Trends and Analysis.

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2017). Contemporary environmental accounting: issues, concepts, and practice. Routledge.

Seele, P., & Gatti, L. (2017). Greenwashing Revisited: In Search of a Typology and Accusation?Based Definition Incorporating Legitimacy Strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 239-252.

Seyam, A. A., & Brickman, S. (2016). The new requirements relating to going concern evaluation and disclosure provide a critical improvement to the financial statements taken as a whole. International Journal of Business and Economic Development (IJBED), 4(1).

Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Palmer, S. B. (2017). Causal agency theory. In Development of Self-Determination through the Life-Course (pp. 55-67). Springer, Dordrecht.

Silva, A., Sancovschi, M., & Santos, A. (2017). The Opportunistic Approach of the Positive Accounting Theory Fails to Explain a Case Study: An Anomalous Situation?.

Smith, M. (2017). Research methods in accounting. Sage.

Stapinski, H. (22 March 2018). The Actor incorporates.

Trottier, K., & Gordon, I. M. (2017). Agency theory: applications in Behavioural Accounting Research. In The Routledge Companion to Behavioural Accounting Research (pp. 121-130). Routledge

Watts, R. L., & Zuo, L. (2016). Understanding practice and institutions: A historical perspective. Accounting Horizons, 30(3), 409-423.


Buy ACC341 New Taxation Law Answers Online

Talk to our expert to get the help with ACC341 New Taxation Law Answers to complete your assessment on time and boost your grades now

The main aim/motive of the management assignment help services is to get connect with a greater number of students, and effectively help, and support them in getting completing their assignments the students also get find this a wonderful opportunity where they could effectively learn more about their topics, as the experts also have the best team members with them in which all the members effectively support each other to get complete their diploma assignments. They complete the assessments of the students in an appropriate manner and deliver them back to the students before the due date of the assignment so that the students could timely submit this, and can score higher marks. The experts of the assignment help services at urgenthomework.com are so much skilled, capable, talented, and experienced in their field of programming homework help writing assignments, so, for this, they can effectively write the best economics assignment help services.

Get Online Support for ACC341 New Taxation Law Assignment Help Online

Copyright © 2009-2023 UrgentHomework.com, All right reserved.