The Portfolio for this unit consists of two elements and carrys 50% of the total unit mark
Element 1: HSE Case study executive summary 20% of the total unit mark
Element 2: “Non-conventional resources” 20% for the essay and 10% for the poster of the total unit mark which consists of 500 word essay and a poster on your topic as listed in table 2.
Work that is wholly plagiarized will receive a mark of zero .
The course work is worth 50% of the final unit mark; All work should conform to the submission guidelines in the Student Handbook. In particular, your essay should be word-processed and printed on A4 paper, using a 12-point font and 1.5 spacing. You should include a title page with your student number, the name of your instructor and of course name as well as the title of your Critical Review of Sources (CROS.
Marking and feedback for the portfolio
The unit team aim to achieve reliable, consistent and reproducible judgements on your work. In accordance with University regulations, each assessment is marked against a scheme that distinguishes between different levels of achievement.
You can expect the following feedback on assessments undertaken for this unit.
If you use any indented quotations, these should be single-spaced.
You will also receive feedback during classes and through the Moodle site, and additional opportunities to receive feedback are available from the unit team.
Your assessments are evaluated relative to the criteria outlined below. These provide a consistent reference point to distinguish between different levels of achievement. You should always take these criteria into consideration when preparing for any assessment on this unit.
Conduct research to find a case study demonstrating a disaster in the oil and gas sector such as Piper Alpha, BP Macondo in the Gulf of Mexico. Analyse the case study for what happened, what lessons can be learned from them and produce a 2-4 page executive summary covering some or all of the following topics
“Risk assessments of oil industry, HSEQ common principles, Health, Safety, Environmental, Security Risk Management Critical safety behaviours, HSEQ observation and intervention, Incident reporting and investigation, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)”
The overall theme of this year’s coursework will be non-conventional resources, related to the Oil and Gas sector such as, Shale Gas,, Shale Oil, Cole Bed Methane, Tight Gas, Heavy Oil, Tar Sands and etc. You will explore these issues by researching suitable sources (written, audio, and video), but more importantly by means of comparing them to conventional resources and highlighting the limitation in the life cycle from exploration to production, storage and economics as a commodity . You will write up your findings in short paragraphs essay as well as a poster. You can create these posters using PowerPoint or Microsoft Publisher; we encourage you to make them as colourful and attractive as possible by including tables, diagrams, and pictures.
The writing assessment will be called the Critical Review of Sources (CROS). This is a kind of essay in which you discuss and summarize the reading (plus listening and video sources) you have done in preparation for an assignment. You may be familiar with the term ‘literature review’, which has a very similar meaning.
Your CROS will have the same title as your poster on a non-conventional topic. However, the CROS and poster are individual assignment for your topic see table 2 page 4.
Imagine someone has seen your poster, is interested by the topic, and wants to know more about it. Your CROS will tell them which books and articles they should read, plus what they should listen to or view online – and why. You can also be critical by telling them what they should not read (listen to or view) – and why.
You must refer to at least 10 different sources, of which at least 8 should be academic no older than 2012. If you are not sure if a source is academic, try to find it from the University library page. You can make use of readings you have discussed in your classes. All sources should be in English, and referenced according to the APA 6th Edition system . You must include a final reference list (bibliography). You should aim to write (1.5-2 Pages), excluding the reference list, tables and figures. Divide your work into paragraphs and pay particular attention to accuracy in grammar and vocabulary; if you are not sure of something, check it in a grammar book or dictionary.
Project 1 – Coalbed Methane Reservoir Engineering Fundamentals I |
|
1. Dual Porosity Structure of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs |
|
2. Coalbed Methane Storage Mechanisms |
|
3. Langmuir Isotherms in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs (do not discuss binary Langmuir isotherms) |
|
4. Transport Mechanisms in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs |
|
5. Matrix Shrinkage/Compaction, Coal Permeability and Coal Relative Permeability |
|
Project 2 – Coalbed Methane Reservoir Engineering Fundamentals II |
|
1. Binary Langmuir Isotherms in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs |
|
2. Volumetric Gas in Place Calculations in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs |
|
3. Gas Content in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs |
|
4. Inflow Performance Relationship in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs |
|
5. Decline Curve Analysis in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs |
|
Project 3 - Shale Gas Hydraulic Fracturing |
|
1. Effect of Hydraulic Fracture Spacing in Shale Gas Production |
|
2. Effect of Horizontal Well Length in Shale Gas Production |
|
3. Effect of Number of Fractures in Shale Gas Production |
|
4. Effect of Proppant Number and Type on Shale Gas Production |
|
5. Effect of Brittle and Ductile Shales on Hydraulic Fracturing |
|
Project 4 - Shale Gas Evaluation |
|
1. Measurement of Total Organic Carbon using Filter Acidification Method |
|
2. Measurement of Total Organic Carbon using Nonfilter Acidification Method |
|
3. Measurement of Total Organic Carbon using Bulk Density Log Method |
|
4. Measurement of Total Organic Carbon using Gamma Ray Log |
|
5. Measurement of Total Organic Carbon using Rock Eval Method |
|
Project 5 – Shale Gas Fundamentals |
|
1. Differences between Shale Gas and Coalbed Methane Reservoirs |
|
2. Differences between Shale Gas and Conventional Sandstone Reservoirs |
|
3. Thermal Maturity in Shale Gas and Oil Gas Reservoirs |
|
4. Gas in Place in Shale Gas Reservoirs |
|
5. Slick Water Fracturing in Shale Gas Reservoirs |
|
Project 6 - Shale Gas Asset Life Cycle |
|
1. Exploratory Phase Stage of the Asset Life Cycle |
|
2. Appraisal Phase Stage of the Asset Life Cycle |
|
3. Development Phase Stage of the Asset Life Cycle |
|
4. Production Phase Stage of the Asset Life Cycle |
|
5. Rejuvenation Phase Stage of the Asset Life Cycle |
|
Project 7 - Oil Shale Fundamentals |
|
1. Energy Potential of Oil Shale around the World |
|
2. Shale Oil and Oil Shale |
|
3. Surface Retorting and In-Situ Retorting of Oil Shale |
|
4. Social and Economic Impact of Oil Shale Development |
|
5. Determining the Grade of Oil Shale |
|
Project 8 - Tight Gas Sandstones Reservoirs |
|
1. Energy Potential of Tight Gas Sandstones around the World |
|
2. Tight Gas Reservoir Characterisation (Geology, and Rock Properties) |
|
3. Petro physical Characterisation of Tight Gas Reservoirs |
|
4. Drilling and Completion and Development Strategy in Tight Gas Sandstones compared to Conventional Sandstones |
|
5. Comparison of Tight Gas Sandstones to Shale Gas Reservoirs |
|
Project 9 – Gas Hydrates |
|
1. Energy Potential of Gas Hydrates |
|
2. Nature and Formation of Gas Hydrates |
|
3. Applications of Gas Hydrates |
|
4. Gas Hydrates Exploitation Method |
|
5. Gas Hydrates Problems in Drilling and Production Engineering |
|
Project 10 – Heavy Oil/Oil Sands |
|
1. Energy Potential of Oil Sands |
|
2. Heavy Oil and Oil Sands |
|
3. Alkali Surfactant Polymer Flooding of Heavy Oil Reservoirs |
|
4. Cyclic Steam Flooding and Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage |
|
5. Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand |
|
Project 11 – Shale Oil Production Analysis |
|
1. Linear, Bilinear and Boundary Dominated Flow Regimes |
|
2. Material Balance Time Plot and its use in Shale Reservoirs |
|
3. Square Root Time Plot and its use in Shale Reservoirs |
|
4. Flowing Material Balance and its use in Shale Reservoirs |
|
5. Arp’s decline curve analysis in Shale Reservoirs |
|
Project 12 – Barnett Shale |
|
1. Geological description of the Barnett Shale |
|
2. Reservoir Description of the Barnett Shale |
|
3. Production Development of the Barnett Shale |
|
4. Production Performance of the Barnett Shale |
|
5. Fiscal Regime and Economics of the Barnett Shale |
|
Project 13 – Hydraulic Fracturing Developments |
|
1. History of Hydraulic Fracturing in the US and UK |
|
2. Social Effects of Hydraulic Fracturing in the UK |
|
3. Social Effects of Hydraulic Fracturing in the US |
|
4. Regulations regarding Hydraulic Fracturing in the UK and US |
|
5. New Technologies in Hydraulic Fracturing Developments |
|
Project 14 – Bowland Shale, Weald Basin and Midland Valley Shales |
|
1. Unconventional Shale wells and fields in the UK |
|
2. Reservoir and Geological Properties of Bowland Shale |
|
3. Reservoir and Geological Properties of Weald Basin Shales |
|
4. Reservoir and Geological Properties of Midland Valley Shales |
Some tips on structure and content of element 2 unconventional essay
You can comment on how reliable a source is from an academic point of view. Is it, for example, out of date, or written by someone with strong views that might affect their judgement?
Tips for Writing an Executive Summary
An Executive Summary summarizes the key points of a lengthy research report or publication. Although research reports are often highly technical in nature, the goal of an Executive Summary is to communicate in a simple manner so that the information can be understood by all readers, regardless of their knowledge or expertise. The Executive Summary is used by managers to understand the broader policy context of research and make decisions about changes to policies, programs, or investment decisions.
Typically, an Executive Summary is 3-4 pages in length. A longer summary is often used when it contains charts or other illustrations. The Executive Summary should be organized according to the following categories – Project Summary, Background, Process, Finding and Conclusions and Recommendations for Action. Following is a description of the type of information to consider for each of these categories. It is not intended to be an exhaustive listing of the type of information that is Appropriate to convey—these are examples to help you think about key items that should be communicated.
PROJECT SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
Who was involved?
PROCESS
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION
WRITING AND STYLE
When writing the Executive Summary it is best to keep the writing and style simple and concise.
Following are a few reminders for good communications:
for the reader. For instance if the research involves rubblization – explain it.
instead of “program goals were achieved.”
The assignment I got was complicated enough and it was hard for someone else to do it. Our professor had explained a proper technique and format to do it, I was worried if urgenthomework could do it or not? I had a talk with their customer care and they gave me the contact details of the expert who would do my work. I told them the procedure and I was surprised by the product delivery. It was an excellent work framed in the style and Format I wanted it.
I had a critical task accommodation due date. One of my companions recommended that I should hire the services of urgenthomework.com. When I put in the task request, they quickly acknowledged it and comprehended the earnestness and urgency of time. they conveyed my task until before a day of submission date. Services are as good as your writing is. And quite affordable as well. Wish you good luck for the future. Keep growing.
I have been using this website since last many years. It helps me in my college project and homework. Excellent study materials are provided which is easy to understand and learn. Read More
Follow Us